ORBIT DEVELOPERS

Introduction to Orbit Developers

Orbit Developers is a real estate builder operating in the Indian states of Gujarat and Maharashtra. While they have made a name for themselves in the construction space, the company has not been without its challenges, having faced a total of two complaints, resulting in one win and one loss in legal cases. This blog aims to provide a detailed analysis of their legal standing and offer insights for potential homebuyers.

Legal Cases Against Orbit Developers

Case Overview

1. Case Lost by Orbit Developers
   - Claim by Appellant: The appellant contended that the project in question was ongoing and thus, required registration with the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA).
   - Claim by Respondent (Orbit Developers): The builder argued that the project was not ongoing and did not require registration.
   - Final Verdict: The appeal was dismissed, concluding that the appellant was not entitled to relief under …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Orbit Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns underlying the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion or classification, and penalties for project delays.

Many of the cases involve penalties for delays, where customers or partners contested the builder's failure to complete projects on time. This theme highlights an ongoing issue in the real estate sector where builders often face challenges in meeting ambitious timelines. Disputes over land conversion or classification also emerged, indicating a need for clarity in property regulations and builder obligations.

The reasons people brought cases to court vary; however, common triggers include contesting penalties, disputing project delays attributed to other parties, and disagreements over land classification. Builders like Orbit Developers might face litigation due to insufficient transparency or communication regarding project timelines and …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder Orbit Developers, which the builder won, revealed several interesting insights into the nature of disputes between the builder and opposing parties. The cases primarily fall under two common themes: Regulatory Non-compliance and Project Classification Disputes. Each of these categories captures recurring issues that have been raised by buyers or regulatory bodies in various forms.

In instances of Regulatory Non-compliance, the appellant often claimed that the builder was required to register ongoing projects in line with regulations such as MahaRERA. However, the builder effectively countered these claims by proving that the projects in question did not fall under the designation of 'ongoing,' thus negating the need for registration. On the other hand, Project Classification Disputes emerged when there were disagreements over whether projects met legal criteria or required specific regulatory compliance.

These disputes often arose from buyers feeling wronged over perceived …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis