| CIN | U40102DL1993PTC052875 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | N-2 SOUTH EXTENSION, PART-I NEW DELHI South Delhi DL 110049 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive real estate market of Haryana, ORCHID INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS Private Limited stands out as a notable player. However, like any builder, they come with a mix of successes and challenges in their legal journeys. This article provides a comprehensive analysis of ORCHID INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS based on their litigation history, which potential buyers should consider before making a purchasing decision.
Legal Landscape of ORCHID INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS
According to the information available, ORCHID INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS has received a total of 13 complaints, with a mixed record in resolving these issues. Out of these, the builder has won 6 cases while losing 7, indicating a need for potential buyers to assess their legal standing closely.
Cases Won by ORCHID INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS
In the cases ORCHID INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS successfully navigated, several patterns emerge:
- Withdrawal of Appeals: Three of the cases won by the builder involved appellants seeking to withdraw their …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, ORCHID INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolved around two key themes: the 'Withdrawal of Appeals' and 'Disputes Over Related Complaints.' The builder frequently sought to withdraw appeals following final decisions in related complaints. Interestingly, in each instance, the respondents did not contest the builder's request to withdraw, leading to the dismissal of the appeals as withdrawn. This trend highlights a common narrative in these disputes where the builder may have resolved underlying issues before the legal proceedings could fully unfold.
The primary reason the builder brought these cases to court was often to clarify its position following decisions in related legal matters. By seeking withdrawal of the appeals, the builder aimed to streamline its litigation process, indicating a proactive approach to managing legal relationships and resolving issues amicably. This approach also suggests …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, ORCHID INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following insights. The disputes filed against the builder can be categorized under three primary themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Facility Provision Disputes, and Document Compliance Issues.
- Delayed Possession Claims: Several cases involved complaints from buyers regarding delays in possession of their residential units. In these instances, the builder successfully demonstrated that possession was provided as per the agreed terms, thus refuting any claims for additional delay-related charges. This indicates a pattern where buyers misunderstood or miscommunicated the actual timelines set forth in their contracts with the builder.
- Facility Provision Disputes: Other claims revolved around the allegation that the builder failed to provide basic amenities such as water, electricity, and managing maintenance. The builder defended itself by citing that the responsibility for maintenance was transferred to the resident welfare …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!