ORRIS INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the past few years, Orris Infrastructure Private Limited has made significant strides in residential development, primarily focusing its efforts in the state of Haryana. However, like many builders within the real estate industry, it has faced legal challenges, resulting in a notable number of complaints. This blog post aims to delve into the performance of Orris Infrastructure, analyze common patterns in their legal cases, and provide valuable insights for potential homebuyers.

Overview of Orris Infrastructure Private Limited

Orris Infrastructure is an emerging player in the real estate sector with a fearless approach towards project development. While the company has several projects underway in Haryana, they have also encountered a considerable number of complaints, totaling 139. A breakdown of the legal outcomes shows the company's performance in resolving disputes:

• Cases Won: 35
• Cases Lost: 104

This paints a picture of a builder that has faced substantial scrutiny and legal …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Orris Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into the common themes and disputes faced by the builder. The cases can be broadly categorized into several types, including delayed possession claims, refund and compensation disputes, non-compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA), assured return and interest payment delays, and project completion and handover issues.

Many of the cases revolved around delayed possession claims, where buyers sought compensation for the excessive time taken by the builder to complete and hand over their units. This highlights an ongoing concern among buyers regarding the builder's ability to meet project timelines. Refund and compensation disputes were also frequent, indicating that buyers were often dissatisfied with the builder's performance and sought to recoup their investments.

The builder faced several cases due to non-compliance with RERA, which raises serious questions about their adherence to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder, ORRIS INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, which it lost reveals significant insights into its operational challenges and legal disputes.

One prominent theme identified is Regulatory Compliance Issues. In several cases, the builder contested that the provisions of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, did not apply to their projects, primarily arguing that they had obtained occupation certificates prior to the Act's enforcement. However, the opposition maintained that these projects were ongoing and thus subject to the Act's requirements. This highlights a common misunderstanding or misinterpretation of regulatory timelines affecting the builder's legal stance.

Another recurring theme is Disputes Over Project Status. The builder frequently claimed that their interests or returns should be considered during compliance assessments; however, they often failed to meet pre-deposit requirements as mandated by the authorities. This indicates a pattern where the builder was …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, ORRIS INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, which it won, revealed the following information.

The cases primarily revolve around themes like Settlement Disputes, Claims of Grievance Resolution, and Refund and Compensation Issues.

In these cases, the builder has engaged in litigation primarily to contest disputes regarding the settlement of grievances raised by allottees, especially when refund claims and resolutions are put into question.

The recurring motif indicates a consistent approach towards addressing and resolving disputes amicably, often leading to formal settlements that are recognized by regulatory authorities.

The builder commonly brought these cases to court in response to disputes over claims made by buyers about unresolved issues related to compensation and refunds.

Often, the grievances stemmed from misunderstandings or miscommunication regarding settlements reached and the recognition of these settlements by the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority.

This suggests a pattern where claims may not …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes centered around several recurring themes, notably including Delayed Possession Claims, Refund Claims and Compensation, Jurisdictional Disputes, Withdrawal of Complaints, Identical Case Dismissals, and Settlement Resolutions.

The Delayed Possession Claims often involved complainants arguing that possession was not delivered on time, seeking refunds and compensation. However, the builder frequently defended itself by citing unforeseen circumstances and highlighting the complainants' delays in payments. For Refund Claims, similar arguments were presented, but authorities generally ruled in favor of the builder, directing only payment of delay interest rather than full refunds.

Jurisdictional Disputes emerged when complainants sought relief in jurisdictions that were deemed inappropriate, with authorities advising them to approach the proper forums. Cases involving Withdrawal of Complaints showed that some complainants chose not to pursue their cases, leading to case dismissals. Identical Case Dismissals …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis