
CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Overview of PACIFICA INDIA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED
PACIFICA INDIA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED is a notable builder operating primarily in Gujarat. With a reported six complaints filed against them, the builder has navigated through several legal challenges, resulting in a mix of outcomes.
Legal Case Summary
In total, PACIFICA has encountered a combination of cases, of which they won four and lost two. The history of litigation reveals some interesting dynamics.
Cases Won
- Withdrawal of Complaints: In multiple instances, complainants opted to withdraw their complaints, showcasing a trend of amicable settlements outside of court. This includes three cases where the complainants decided to resolve disputes without pursuing further legal action.
- RERA Act Violation: A significant case involved a violation of the RERA Act, in which PACIFICA was found guilty of accepting over 10% of the property’s value without a proper agreement for sale. This illustrates how legal frameworks can …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Pacifica India Projects Private Limited, which it lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties involved.
The cases highlight two main types of grievances: violations of the RERA Act and disputes over sale agreements/project delays. In the first type, the builder was found to have accepted more than the permitted 10% of the consideration amount from unit holders without formalizing an agreement for sale, leading to a penalty as mandated by the RERA regulations. This indicates a systemic issue where the builder may have been operating without adhering to the necessary legal frameworks, potentially risking the trust of its clients.
The second type of cases revolve around project delays and disputes arising from the sale of units in specific projects, such as 'North Enclave.' While the details provided in the summary for this case are limited, it …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, PACIFICA INDIA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, which it won, revealed the following information.
The cases filed by this builder can be grouped into several common themes. The first theme is the occurrence of complaint withdrawals. In two cases, the complainants chose to withdraw their complaints, resulting in the dismissal of those matters. This indicates either a lack of sufficient evidence or reconsideration of their claims by the complainants. The second theme involves disputes that specifically target concerns related to projects, such as the case against Susmit B. Gohel for the North Enclave project. Such disputes emphasize the complexity and various expectations that arise between builders and clients.
PACIFICA INDIA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED commonly brings cases to court for reasons such as contesting penalties or disagreements that arise with individuals associated with specific projects. These litigations could stem from disputes on project delays …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, PACIFICA INDIA PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily fell under a few common themes, including disputes over project-related issues, negotiation and conflict resolution between the parties, and instances resulting in the withdrawal of claims.
In the cases dealt with by PACIFICA INDIA PROJECTS, a significant number revolved around complaints from buyers regarding specific issues with the flats or projects. For example, one notable case involved a claim about a flat booked in the 'Windward Business Park' project. This indicates that issues related to project quality and customer dissatisfaction are common themes in disputes with real estate builders.
The reasons behind these complaints stem from various factors, such as contesting penalties imposed on the builders, claims of project delays, or disagreements surrounding project specifications and quality. In many situations, buyers expressed dissatisfaction with the …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!