| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to selecting a builder for your dream home or real estate investment, evaluating their track record is crucial. Padmavati Developers, operating primarily in Madhya Pradesh, has recently come under scrutiny due to their legal history. With a single complaint lodged against them and one case lost in favor of the complainant, potential buyers are keen to assess the builder's reliability and reputation. This blog post will delve into the details of the builder’s legal accidents, the patterns observed, and overall buyer considerations.
Overview of Legal Issues
Padmavati Developers has faced one notable complaint, where they lost the case entirely. The details reveal a significant concern: the applicant claimed that Padmavati Developers failed to deliver possession of their plot and did not finalize development work even after receiving full payment. The final verdict mandated that the builders are liable to repay the applicant the principal amount along …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Padmavati Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into delayed possession claims and failures to complete development work, highlighting significant issues in fulfilling contractual obligations to customers.
The cases demonstrate that common reasons for litigation against the builder include the failure to provide possession of plots despite receiving full payment and not completing required development work. This reflects a troubling trend where buyers are left waiting for both their property and the promised amenities, leading to legitimate claims for compensation and damages.
The builder's defense, or lack thereof, points to another pattern: the non-applicants failed to respond to complaints, resulting in default losses. The authority's verdicts consistently mandated the builder to repay the principal amount owed, along with interest and compensation for mental distress and other incurred expenses.
The underlying reasons for the builder's …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!