builder logo

PADMAVATI DEVELOPERS

  • No of Complaints: 1
  • States (Active in): Madhya Pradesh
CIN Not Available
Year Established Not Available
Address Not Available
Company Status Not Available

Introduction

When it comes to selecting a builder for your dream home or real estate investment, evaluating their track record is crucial. Padmavati Developers, operating primarily in Madhya Pradesh, has recently come under scrutiny due to their legal history. With a single complaint lodged against them and one case lost in favor of the complainant, potential buyers are keen to assess the builder's reliability and reputation. This blog post will delve into the details of the builder’s legal accidents, the patterns observed, and overall buyer considerations.

Overview of Legal Issues

Padmavati Developers has faced one notable complaint, where they lost the case entirely. The details reveal a significant concern: the applicant claimed that Padmavati Developers failed to deliver possession of their plot and did not finalize development work even after receiving full payment. The final verdict mandated that the builders are liable to repay the applicant the principal amount along with interest, as well as compensation for mental distress. Notably, Padmavati Developers did not respond to the complaint, which further complicates their standing.

Patterns Observed

Cases Lost

In analyzing the case lost by Padmavati Developers, a clear pattern emerges:

  • Failure to Deliver: The primary issue revolved around the builder's inability to provide the promised possession of the property and to complete necessary developmental tasks.
  • Lack of Engagement: The decision not to respond to the complaint indicates a troubling approach to client concerns, reflecting a potential communication gap or disengagement with buyers.

This lack of responsiveness can erode buyer trust significantly, signaling to future customers a possible risk if they encounter similar issues.

Cases Won

Interestingly, the data does not provide information on any cases won by Padmavati Developers. They currently show a poor track record, with a single case resulting in an unfavorable outcome. The absence of won cases jeopardizes potential confidence from buyers who may seek reassurance from a builder's legal history that includes favorable outcomes.

Conclusion

Based on the limited information provided about Padmavati Developers, potential buyers need to exercise caution. The builder's solitary complaint resulting in a lost case and lack of any successful defense presents significant red flags. It suggests that, at least in this instance, the builder does not prioritize customer satisfaction or legal compliance, which could lead to similar complications for prospective buyers.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Conduct Thorough Research: Investigate the builder’s history and any legal issues. Consider reaching out to current and past customers to gauge their satisfaction levels.
  2. Prioritize Communication: Choose builders who demonstrate clear, open lines of communication. A builder’s willingness to engage with complaints can be indicative of their overall service quality.
  3. Evaluate Legal Compliance: Ensure that the builder adheres to local regulations and check if any prior issues have been resolved satisfactorily.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

  • Check for Reviews and Complaints: Scrutinize online reviews, ratings, and any legal complaints filed against the builder.
  • Examine Project Track Record: Look into previous projects and their completion timelines. Has the builder consistently delivered quality work?
  • Verify Credentials: Ensure that the builder is licensed and possesses the necessary credentials mandated by local authorities.
  • Consult Professionals: When in doubt, seek advice from real estate professionals or legal counsel to better navigate your buying process.

In conclusion, while each builder has their strengths and weaknesses, respective diligence from buyers can significantly mitigate risks and lead to successful property investments.

No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Delayed Possession Claims Failure to Complete Development Work Compensation for Mental Distress and Expenses

Analysis of the cases filed against Padmavati Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into delayed possession claims and failures to complete development work, highlighting significant issues in fulfilling contractual obligations to customers.

The cases demonstrate that common reasons for litigation against the builder include the failure to provide possession of plots despite receiving full payment and not completing required development work. This reflects a troubling trend where buyers are left waiting for both their property and the promised amenities, leading to legitimate claims for compensation and damages.

The builder's defense, or lack thereof, points to another pattern: the non-applicants failed to respond to complaints, resulting in default losses. The authority's verdicts consistently mandated the builder to repay the principal amount owed, along with interest and compensation for mental distress and other incurred expenses.

The underlying reasons for the builder's losses seem to stem from a combination of factors, most notably the failure to adhere to their commitments and a lack of participation in the legal proceedings. This suggests a systemic issue where builders may prioritize profit over the ethical obligations to their clients, followed by a failure to engage with legal challenges that could potentially rectify such grievances.

Overall, these cases shine a spotlight on the caution buyers should exercise when engaging with builders who may have such legal precedents. It is crucial to evaluate a builder's reputation, past projects, and any legal disputes before making a purchase decision, ensuring that buyers protect their investments to the fullest extent possible.

This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.

Case Number State Summary Case Topic Detailed Summary Appellant Name Respondent Name Source
7-07|4-47-0469 Madhya Pradesh The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a… ["Non-provision of … {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… Smt. Trupti Khandel… Padmavati Developers https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/722726672618.pdf

Interested to buy from this builder?

Assured Callback in 5 mins