PALAVA DWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 1
- States (Active in): Maharashtra
| CIN | U70100MH2005PTC154993 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 22-Jul-05 |
| Address | 412, Floor- 4, 17G , Vardhaman Chamber, Cawasji Patel Road, Horniman Circle, Fort, Mumbai Mumbai City MH 400001 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
In the ever-evolving real estate market, buyers are keen to understand the performance and reliability of builders before investing in properties. One such builder that has caught the attention of potential homeowners is PALAVA DWELLERS Private Limited. This article delves into the builder’s complaint history, legal performance, and offers insights for potential buyers considering a purchase from them.
Overview of PALAVA DWELLERS Private Limited
PALAVA DWELLERS Private Limited operates primarily in Maharashtra and has a relatively low number of complaints against them, totaling just one. Impressively, the builder has a clean slate in terms of legal disputes, having won the only case filed against them.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost
While PALAVA DWELLERS Private Limited has not lost any cases, it is important to analyze the one case that resulted in a decision against the builder:
- Appellant's Claim: The appellant claimed that possession of their flat was delayed and sought a refund of the amount paid.
- Respondent's Claim: The builder argued that the possession was delivered within the agreed time frame and contended that the appellant was not entitled to a refund.
- Final Verdict: The tribunal found that the delay in possession was not significant and ruled in favor of the builder, denying the refund request.
From this case, it can be observed that disputes may arise over possession timelines, with buyers potentially feeling aggrieved by perceived delays. However, the tribunal’s decision indicates that the builder maintains satisfactory delivery timelines according to contractual agreements.
Cases Won
The builder has successfully managed its legal challenges, establishing a positive trend. The success in this particular case highlights:
- Robust Documentation: The builder seems to maintain proper records and documentation, which may support their claims during legal disputes.
- Adherence to Agreements: The outcome suggests that PALAVA DWELLERS Private Limited complies with contractual obligations regarding possession timelines.
Conclusion
Overall, PALAVA DWELLERS Private Limited showcases a commendable record in terms of legal disputes, with only one complaint and a winning outcome. This suggests that potential buyers may feel a degree of confidence when considering a purchase.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Document Review: Always review the builder's history with possession timelines and service delivery to understand what you can expect.
- Legal Agreement Clarity: Ensure that your purchase agreement is clear on timelines for possession and other critical factors that could lead to disputes.
- Seek Testimonials: Look for feedback from existing homeowners for first-hand experiences regarding the builder's reliability.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Research Thoroughly: Investigate a builder’s reputation, including any previous complaints and how they were resolved.
- Check for Licenses: Ensure that the builder has all necessary licenses and approvals to operate in your state.
- Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit existing properties by the builder to assess quality and customer satisfaction.
By being informed and vigilant, potential buyers can make wise choices in selecting their builders, ensuring a smooth home-buying journey.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, PALAVA DWELLERS Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The predominant theme among the disputes was claims regarding delayed possession of flats. Specifically, there were no significant disputes over other aspects like penalties for project delays, non-compliance with municipal orders, or land conversion issues in the reviewed case. This indicates that the bulk of the legal challenges focused on the timing of possession rather than broader regulatory or classification disputes.
In the examined case, the appellant claimed that possession of their flat was delayed and sought a refund of the amount paid. The builder countered this by demonstrating that possession was indeed given within the agreed time frame and argued that the appellant was not entitled to any refund. This showcases a common reason for litigation where buyers contest the fulfillment of possession timings. It is important to note that such cases often emerge from differing interpretations of timelines. In repeated circumstances, buyers may feel aggrieved, leading them to take their grievances to court, often due to miscommunications or misunderstandings.
The tribunal’s ruling underscored the effectiveness of the builder's defense, which relied on presenting evidence that substantiated their claim of compliance with the agreed timelines. The tribunal notably recognized that the delay, if any, was not significant enough to warrant a refund. This points to a common reason for the builder’s successful outcomes: buyers sometimes lack sufficient evidence to support their claims during disputes or misinterpret the contractual timelines.
This analysis offers valuable insight into the builder’s reputation and the dynamics of the broader real estate market. The cases suggest that while there are indeed valid disputes that arise in the real estate sector, they can often stem from buyers' misunderstandings or attempts to exaggerate claims. PALAVA DWELLERS Private Limited appears to possess a robust capacity to defend itself against unjust claims, which can bolster its image among prospective buyers. Nonetheless, potential buyers should be wary and exercise due diligence before forming opinions about a builder’s reliability.
In conclusion, this analysis encourages future home buyers to make informed decisions. While some disputes in the real estate market are legitimate, many builders, including PALAVA DWELLERS Private Limited, are well-equipped to navigate legal challenges stemming from false or exaggerated accusations. As a buyer, it is crucial to approach claims with caution and seek out reliable information to fully understand a builder’s reputation.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT006000000052783 | Maharashtra | The appellant sought refund for delay in possessi… | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Mr. Nikhil Chopra | Palava Dwellers Pri… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1azu2csd7Hp843zloFpDBjpda3NCjLXmH |