PANCHSHEEL BUILDTECH PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 4
- States (Active in): Uttar Pradesh
| CIN | U45200DL2006PTC156772 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 20-Dec-06 |
| Address | G-124, SHOP NO.5, DILSHAD COLONY DELHI DL 110092 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
In the ever-evolving real estate market, choosing the right builder is crucial for prospective homeowners. One such builder operating in Uttar Pradesh is PANCHSHEEL BUILDTECH Private Limited. This article delves into the builder's legal standing, particularly focusing on complaints and case outcomes, providing potential buyers with essential insights.
Overview of PANCHSHEEL BUILDTECH Private Limited
PANCHSHEEL BUILDTECH Private Limited has recorded a total of 4 complaints against them. Alarmingly, they have not won any cases, resulting in a 100% loss rate in legal proceedings. This statistic raises concerns about the builder's handling of customer grievances and their overall business practices.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Won
Despite having lost all cases, it’s important to note that there have been cases where the builder sought condonation of delays regarding the filing of appeals. In these instances, the appellant's claim usually revolved around the health of the counsel and procedural delays in receiving necessary documentation.
- Common Factors in Won Cases:
- Requests for condonation of delays often stemmed from reasonable causes, like the ill health of legal counsel.
- The respondent did not contest the application for condonation in several cases, leading to favorable verdicts regarding the extension of timelines for filing objections.
- The legal system responded positively by allowing applications to be restored, although this does not reflect positively on the builder's performance or customer satisfaction.
Cases Lost
PANCHSHEEL BUILDTECH's failure to win any cases suggests a consistent trend of dissatisfaction among clients or plaintiffs in these legal disputes.
- Common Factors in Lost Cases:
- The builder's inability to contest or mitigate complaints effectively, resulting in consistently adverse outcomes.
- The absence of any recorded wins indicates a potential pattern of poor customer service or dissatisfaction that leads clients to seek legal recourse.
Conclusion
PANCHSHEEL BUILDTECH Private Limited presents a concerning picture for prospective customers, particularly given their lack of success in legal matters related to customer complaints. Buyers should be cautious and diligent when considering investments with this company.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Thorough Research: Before making any purchase, ensure you have a thorough understanding of the builder's reputation and history.
- Look for Reviews: Seek out independent reviews from previous customers to gauge their experiences and satisfaction levels.
- Consult Legal Expertise: If considering a property from PANCHSHEEL BUILDTECH, it may be wise to consult with a legal expert who can help interpret any clauses in the purchase agreement.
- Evaluate Alternatives: Don’t hesitate to explore other builders with stronger records in customer satisfaction and legal outcomes.
General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder
- Check Licensing and Certifications: Ensure that the builder has the necessary licenses and certifications to operate.
- Visit Completed Projects: If possible, take the time to visit the builder’s completed projects to assess construction quality and customer satisfaction firsthand.
- Understand Financing and Payment Structures: Be clear on payment plans and project milestones to avoid future confusion or disputes.
- Read Contracts Carefully: Ensure you understand all contracts and documents before signing, as this can prevent misunderstandings later.
In summary, while PANCHSHEEL BUILDTECH has executed some projects in Uttar Pradesh, the legal implications following customer complaints signify why potential buyers should tread carefully.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against PANCHSHEEL BUILDTECH Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key insights across the spectrum of disputes encountered by the builder. The cases highlight two primary themes: "Condonation of Delay Claims" and "Recall of Order Disputes".
The "Condonation of Delay Claims" theme encompasses a significant portion of the cases, where the builder's counsel sought to condone delays in filing applications where the builder was a party. The common reason provided for these delays was the ill health of the counsel handling the case, alongside delays in obtaining new legal representation documents (Vakalatnama). This highlights a pattern where the builder’s litigation was often triggered by situations beyond their direct control, yet resulting in legal repercussions due to the inability to meet filing deadlines.
The "Recall of Order Disputes" theme is closely tied to the first, as many of the condonation of delay claims were filed with the objective of recalling previous orders made by the courts. The builder's respondents consistently showed no objection to the builder's applications for condonation of delay, indicating a degree of cooperation in the legal process or perhaps an acknowledgment of the extraordinary circumstances presented. However, the frequency of these disputes raises concerns about the builder's operational efficiency and compliance with legal timelines, which is critical in the fast-paced real estate sector.
The reasons people commonly brought cases to court in these instances primarily revolved around the builder’s failure to adhere to procedural requirements and timelines, rather than disputes over project specifics or regulatory non-compliance. The patterns emerging from these summaries suggest that the builder's litigation was more reactionary to internal operational inefficiencies rather than proactive measures to resolve project-related disputes.
Examining the outcomes of the cases, it is evident that the builder did not lose due to contested facts or insufficient evidence regarding project delays or damages. Instead, the builder’s losses were primarily procedural, resulting from delays in filing that necessitated condonation applications. This distinction highlights the importance for builders to ensure timely compliance with legal requirements, as procedural missteps can lead to significant legal ramifications, even when the underlying claims may be grounded in valid reasons.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.