CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When considering purchasing property, the reputation and accountability of the builder are crucial factors. Paradise Estate, a builder operating exclusively in Goa, presents an interesting case for potential buyers. This blog post dives into the builder’s legal history, analyzing their track record and offering critical insights for prospective homeowners.
Paradise Estate is a builder that has garnered attention for its projects in the scenic state of Goa. While the allure of beachfront properties and serene living is tempting for many, potential buyers must weigh the builder's reliability and past interactions with clients carefully.
Paradise Estate has faced a total of one complaint, which culminated in a legal case. Here’s a breakdown of their legal situation:
The case against Paradise Estate involved the execution of a sale deed for a villa and compensation for the delay in receiving this deed. The complainant argued for enforcement of the sale agreement due to delays that were impacting their ownership rights.
In response, Paradise Estate attributed the delay to legal complications following the death of the original owner, Mr. Shivdev Singh Malhotra, and the requirement to wait for the formation of a co-operative housing society. The court ultimately ruled that Paradise Estate must execute a registered conveyance deed within two months. The complainant was also instructed to engage in forming an association or society among allottees. The adjudication regarding compensation was to be handled separately.
Paradise Estate’s record indicates that the sole case they faced resulted in a loss. Key patterns from this case included:
Interestingly, Paradise Estate has no cases classified as won. While they did not win any legal battles, the outcome of the singular case addressed some buyer rights through the court's directive, which reflects that issues arose primarily from procedural delays rather than outright negligence. Potential buyers may wish to consider this in their assessment of the builder’s responsiveness and reliability.
Paradise Estate's limited legal experience offers both insights and cautions for potential buyers. With one complaint resulting in a loss related to significant procedural delays, it highlights a possible area for scrutiny. However, the directive from the court signifies a willingness to rectify issues under legal frameworks, which may provide some comfort to prospective clients.
Considering these factors will empower buyers to make informed decisions regarding Paradise Estate or any builder they may wish to engage with in Goa or beyond.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Paradise Estate, which it lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around two main topics: delayed possession claims and legal issues stemming from property ownership.
The delayed possession claims appear to be a major concern for the complainants, who often seek execution of sale deeds and compensation for the builder's failure to deliver properties on time. In the case summarized, the builder attributed the delay to legal complications following the death of the original owner, Mr. Shivdev Singh Malhotra, and the need to form a co-operative housing society. This indicates a pattern where the builder tends to deflect responsibility for delays by citing external legal factors rather than acknowledging potential mismanagement or inadequate planning.
The legal issues arising from property ownership also stand out in these cases. The formation of a co-operative housing society is a recurring element, suggesting that the builder's projects may involve complexities that are not immediately apparent to buyers. The builder's defense often hinges on these legal nuances, which highlights the importance of clarity in property ownership and project management.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting delays, disputing ownership complexities, and seeking compensation for inadequate service delivery. The builder’s repeated losses suggest several underlying issues, such as insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with legal requirements for property transfer, and a lack of transparency with buyers regarding project timelines and ownership structures.
Overall, this analysis indicates that potential buyers should approach Paradise Estate with caution. It is crucial to thoroughly understand the terms of the sale, anticipated timelines, and any legal ramifications associated with property ownership before making a commitment. Buyers should also be prepared to participate in the formation of housing societies, which could entail additional responsibilities and costs.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3/RERA/Complaint(31… | Goa | Complainant seeks execution of sale deed for vill… | ["Real Estate", "Sa… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant seeks execut… | Mrs. Sonia Bhaskar | Paradise Estate | https://rera.goa.gov.in/reraApp/Orderimage?IMG_PATH=/NAfdKkDPWXtCVYV2w4e8A== |