| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Analyzing the Performance of Paramarsh Constructions
When considering a construction company for your next project, potential buyers often look into the builder's past performance, especially in legal matters. In this post, we will delve into the track record of Paramarsh Constructions, evaluating their legal cases and overall performance based on the available data.
Understanding the Legal Landscape
Paramarsh Constructions has a mixed legal history, having faced a total of two complaints. Unfortunately for the builder, they lost both cases, resulting in zero wins in legal disputes. This indicates potential issues in fulfilling contractual obligations or meeting customer expectations, raising concerns for potential buyers.
Breakdown of Legal Cases
Cases Filed Against the Builder:- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 2
The details reveal that all cases involved claims for refunds along with interest and compensation for mental agony caused to the complainants. In both occasions, the appellant sought …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Paramarsh Constructions, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around two main topics: refund and compensation claims, and jurisdictional disputes.
The refund and compensation claims encompassed a significant portion of the cases, where the appellants sought refunds of the amounts paid along with interest and compensation for the mental agony caused due to delays or other grievances with the builder's performance. These cases highlight a common issue in real estate transactions, where buyers often find themselves disputing with builders over financial reimbursements and emotional distress compensations, particularly when projects face delays or quality issues.
Jurisdictional disputes constituted another critical theme, with the builder claiming that the Authority (AO) lacked the jurisdiction to consider refunds of amounts paid with interest. This indicates a troubling trend where builders may attempt to evade accountability by challenging the regulatory framework established …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from PARAMARSH CONSTRUCTIONS?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.