No Logo Available

PARIKRAMA RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION

5.0/5 (15 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Haryana
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the sphere of real estate, buyer confidence hinges greatly on the reputation and conduct of builders. One such entity, the Parikrama Residents Welfare Association in Haryana, has garnered attention due to its compelling legal track record. With a striking statistic of 15 complaints filed against them, they've managed to emerge victorious in all instances. In this blog post, we will delve into the details of these legal cases, exploring the common factors in both victories and losses, ultimately providing insights for prospective buyers.

Overview of Legal Cases

The Parikrama Residents Welfare Association faced a total of 15 legal complaints, with the basis of these cases predominantly focusing on entitlement in common areas under The Haryana Apartment Ownership Act, 1983.

Common Claims in the Cases

Across these cases, the appellants consistently asserted that their claims to the proportionate percentage entitlement in the common areas were not …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Proportionate Percentage Entitlement Disputes Compliance with The Haryana Apartment Ownership Act Common Areas Allocation Disputes

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Parikrama Residents Welfare Association, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The primary theme across these cases was the dispute regarding the proportionate percentage entitlement in common areas as stipulated under The Haryana Apartment Ownership Act, 1983.

  1. Proportionate Percentage Entitlement Disputes: Numerous appellants contested the builder regarding the calculation and allocation of their entitled share in the common areas. These disputes often revolved around the assertion that the builder's deeds did not adhere to the mandates of the 1983 Act, leading to claims of unequal or unfair distribution. Such disputes are crucial as they can impact a buyer's experience and perceived value within the property.
  2. Compliance with The Haryana Apartment Ownership Act: The builder consistently defended the validity of the declaration deed filed before the authority, asserting that all actions were compliant with the regulations …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review

Interested in buying from PARIKRAMA RESIDENTS WELFARE ASSOCIATION?

Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.