No Logo Available

PARMAN BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED

  • No of Complaints: 1
  • States (Active in): Madhya Pradesh
CIN U18101MP1988PTC004529
Year Established 20 April 1988
Address 23/2 OLD PALASIYA STREET NO.3 , INDORE, Madhya Pradesh, India - 452001
Company Status Private

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, the credibility of a builder is significantly dictated by their legal history and customer satisfaction. This blog post provides a detailed analysis of Parman Buildcon Private Limited, focusing on their legal encounters, customer complaints, and potential implications for future buyers.

Company Overview

Parman Buildcon Private Limited is a builder operating primarily in Madhya Pradesh. While they seem to offer property solutions in this region, such an undertaking warrants scrutiny due to the legal backdrop surrounding their operations.

Legal Case Details

A review of the legal cases associated with Parman Buildcon reveals a complex picture. The company has faced a total of 1 complaint. Notably, the outcome of this case was unfavorable for the builder, as they lost the case. Here's a breakdown of the complaint:

  1. Complaint Details:
    • Appellant Claim: The applicant sought compensation for delays in the possession of their flat, along with claims of mental harassment.
    • Respondent Claim: Parman Buildcon contended that the delays were a result of unforeseen circumstances and denied any allegations of mental harassment.
    • Final Verdict: The authority awarded compensation for the delay in possession but rejected the claim regarding mental harassment, indicating some acknowledgment of the delays.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

The data reveals some insights into the builder's legal standing:

  • Lost Cases: There is only one recorded case that Parman Buildcon has lost. The loss stemmed from their inability to meet the possession timeline, which is a critical factor for buyers. The outcome demonstrates that while some claims may be disputed—like mental harassment—their credibility regarding timely delivery is under question.
  • Won Cases: The builder has not won any cases, which suggests that if customers take legal action against them, they may find it difficult to defend their position. This lack of wins could deter future customers from trusting them blindly.

Conclusion and Buyer Considerations

Considering the brimming concerns surrounding Parman Buildcon Private Limited, it is prudent to delve deeper into their operational practices before making a purchasing decision. The lone complaint that resulted in a loss of credibility should alert potential buyers about the builder's reliability in terms of project delivery timelines.

Tips for Potential Buyers:

  1. Investigate Past Performance: Always ask for references related to past projects. A builder with a more extensive portfolio of completed projects may signal reliability.
  2. Inspect Legal Records: Check the builder's legal history for any recurring issues like possession delays or complaints raised by other buyers.
  3. Read Reviews and Testimonials: Seek out customer reviews to gauge satisfaction levels and any recurring complaints about project delivery or quality.
  4. Ensure Clear Agreements: Before signing, ensure all terms about possession timelines and compensation are clearly documented.

General Tips When Selecting Any Builder:

  • Do Thorough Research: Investigate the builder’s background, previous projects, and overall reputation in the market.
  • Clarify Payment Terms: Clearly understand the payment schedule and ensure it aligns with project milestones.
  • Consult Professionals: If uncertain, engage real estate experts or legal personnel to evaluate contracts.

Ultimately, a buyer should feel confident about their investment, and an informed decision is key to that confidence. By being vigilant and thorough, you can navigate your way through the complexities of real estate dealings with builders like Parman Buildcon.

No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Delayed Possession Claims Mental Harassment Allegations

Analysis of the cases filed against Parman Buildcon Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be grouped into two main categories: Delayed Possession Claims and Mental Harassment Allegations.

The cases often involved claims from buyers seeking compensation for delays in the possession of their flats. This is a common theme in real estate disputes, where buyers expect timely delivery of their investments. The builder's defense typically hinged on assertions of unforeseen circumstances causing the delays; however, the authority only granted compensation for the delay in one case, indicating that the reasoning behind these defenses may not be consistently convincing.

Mental harassment claims accompanied the delay compensation requests in some instances. Buyers might have felt aggrieved due to the stress and emotional strain caused by the delays. However, the authority rejected these claims, which suggests that either the evidence presented was insufficient to prove mental harassment or that the threshold for what constitutes harassment in these cases is high.

A pattern emerges where buyers commonly contest the builder's accountability for delays and the builder attributes the responsibility to other factors. This indicates a significant communication gap between builders and buyers regarding project timelines and expectations.

The builder's losses in these cases highlight the importance of adhering to timelines and clear communication in real estate transactions. Builders should take heed of these verdicts and ensure that they have robust systems in place to meet deadlines. Moreover, transparency about project timelines and prompt updates to buyers could mitigate the risk of disputes arising from mental harassment claims.

This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.

Case Number State Summary Case Topic Detailed Summary Appellant Name Respondent Name Source
40-8-0022 Madhya Pradesh The applicant sought compensation for delay in po… ["Delay in possessi… {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed compen… Shri Rajveer Singh Parman Buildcon Pri… https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/0fddfb912217718181282106.pdf

Interested to buy from this builder?

Assured Callback in 5 mins