CIN | U18101MP1988PTC004529 |
---|---|
Year Established | 20 April 1988 |
Address | 23/2 OLD PALASIYA STREET NO.3 , INDORE, Madhya Pradesh, India - 452001 |
Company Status | Private |
In the realm of real estate, the credibility of a builder is significantly dictated by their legal history and customer satisfaction. This blog post provides a detailed analysis of Parman Buildcon Private Limited, focusing on their legal encounters, customer complaints, and potential implications for future buyers.
Parman Buildcon Private Limited is a builder operating primarily in Madhya Pradesh. While they seem to offer property solutions in this region, such an undertaking warrants scrutiny due to the legal backdrop surrounding their operations.
A review of the legal cases associated with Parman Buildcon reveals a complex picture. The company has faced a total of 1 complaint. Notably, the outcome of this case was unfavorable for the builder, as they lost the case. Here's a breakdown of the complaint:
The data reveals some insights into the builder's legal standing:
Considering the brimming concerns surrounding Parman Buildcon Private Limited, it is prudent to delve deeper into their operational practices before making a purchasing decision. The lone complaint that resulted in a loss of credibility should alert potential buyers about the builder's reliability in terms of project delivery timelines.
Ultimately, a buyer should feel confident about their investment, and an informed decision is key to that confidence. By being vigilant and thorough, you can navigate your way through the complexities of real estate dealings with builders like Parman Buildcon.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Parman Buildcon Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be grouped into two main categories: Delayed Possession Claims and Mental Harassment Allegations.
The cases often involved claims from buyers seeking compensation for delays in the possession of their flats. This is a common theme in real estate disputes, where buyers expect timely delivery of their investments. The builder's defense typically hinged on assertions of unforeseen circumstances causing the delays; however, the authority only granted compensation for the delay in one case, indicating that the reasoning behind these defenses may not be consistently convincing.
Mental harassment claims accompanied the delay compensation requests in some instances. Buyers might have felt aggrieved due to the stress and emotional strain caused by the delays. However, the authority rejected these claims, which suggests that either the evidence presented was insufficient to prove mental harassment or that the threshold for what constitutes harassment in these cases is high.
A pattern emerges where buyers commonly contest the builder's accountability for delays and the builder attributes the responsibility to other factors. This indicates a significant communication gap between builders and buyers regarding project timelines and expectations.
The builder's losses in these cases highlight the importance of adhering to timelines and clear communication in real estate transactions. Builders should take heed of these verdicts and ensure that they have robust systems in place to meet deadlines. Moreover, transparency about project timelines and prompt updates to buyers could mitigate the risk of disputes arising from mental harassment claims.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
40-8-0022 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant sought compensation for delay in po… | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed compen… | Shri Rajveer Singh | Parman Buildcon Pri… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/0fddfb912217718181282106.pdf |