| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When choosing a builder for your next real estate investment, it's crucial to consider their track record and legal standing. Today, we focus on Parth Infratech Limited, a builder operating predominantly in Rajasthan, where they have faced some legal challenges. In this blog post, we will analyze the complaints and legal cases filed against Parth Infratech Limited to offer insights for potential buyers.
Legal Overview of Parth Infratech Limited
Parth Infratech Limited has faced a total of 2 complaints. Unfortunately for the builder, they have lost both cases. The details of these cases provide a glimpse into the frequent issues that can arise in the construction sector.
Case Breakdown
1. Case One:- Appellant's Claim: The appellant alleged that the promoter failed to register the ongoing project and disregarded the authority's directives.
- Respondent's Claim: The builder responded by stating that they had appealed the authority's directions and …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Parth Infratech Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around two critical issues: non-compliance with regulatory orders and project registration disputes.
The first theme, non-compliance with regulatory orders, highlights the builder's failure to adhere to the directions provided by the authority. In both cases, the builder was found to have neglected their responsibility to register ongoing projects as mandated by the regulatory framework. This non-compliance not only led to legal consequences but also underscores a troubling pattern of disregard for procedural requirements in the real estate sector.
The second theme centers around project registration disputes, where the builder contested the necessity for project registration based on their claim that the project was completed. However, the authority determined that the project should have been registered, emphasizing the importance of adhering to registration guidelines to ensure transparency …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!