PASHUPATI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS logo

PASHUPATI BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Madhya Pradesh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Overview of Pashupati Builders And Developers

Pashupati Builders And Developers, primarily operating in Madhya Pradesh, is a construction firm that has recently garnered attention due to its legal disputes regarding project completion and possession. While the company has engaged in the real estate sector, its track record reveals a troubling complaint history that potential buyers should carefully consider.

Complaint Analysis: A Closer Look

Number of Complaints

Pashupati Builders And Developers has a single documented complaint against them, raising concerns about their project delivery commitments.

Legal Outcomes

The builder has faced one legal case, which ended unfavorably for them. The details of this case reveal crucial insights into the issues surrounding their business practices. The applicant in this case claimed that the builder failed to provide possession of the building within the stipulated timeframe, leading to a demand for compensation due to this delay. The response from the builder indicated that …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Unforeseen Circumstances Defense Compensation for Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against Pashupati Builders And Developers, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into delayed possession claims, with the applicant often seeking compensation for the builder's failure to provide property within the agreed timeframe.

A common reason for litigation in these cases is the builder's inability to meet project deadlines, which leads to claims of delay and requests for compensation from the applicants. The builder frequently defends itself by attributing the delays to unforeseen circumstances; however, this defense does not seem to resonate with the authorities, as evidenced by the builder's losses in these cases.

The verdicts suggest that the builder was not only unable to provide timely possession but also failed to convince the authorities that the delays were beyond their control. This implies a potential systemic issue within the builder's operations, possibly related to project …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review