| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the real estate market, the reputation of builders plays a critical role in influencing buyer decisions. This blog delves into the practices of Pashupatinath Builders & Developers, a company operating in Madhya Pradesh, and examines the implications of their legal disputes. Given the data on complaints and court outcomes, potential buyers must tread cautiously.
Overview of Complaints
Pashupatinath Builders & Developers has a troubling record, with a total of 80 complaints filed against them. Disturbingly, the builder has lost all 80 cases, indicating a consistent pattern of unfavorable outcomes in legal disputes. The nature of these complaints revolves primarily around delays in possession of the buildings, which has led to significant dissatisfaction among buyers.
Patterns in Legal Cases
Cases Lost
The cases that Pashupatinath Builders & Developers has lost generally highlight the following common themes:
- Delay in Possession: Each case involved applicants who claimed delays …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Pashupatinath Builders & Developers, which it lost, revealed a consistent pattern of disputes primarily revolving around delayed possession of properties. The cases highlighted a range of themes, with the most prevalent being delayed possession claims, followed by the builder's attempts to justify these delays and ensuing compensation disputes.
The majority of the cases (40+ instances) focused on claims made by the applicants that the builder had delayed possession of the building. In each case, the applicants sought compensation for these delays, asserting that the builder had failed to adhere to promised timelines. The builder, on the other hand, consistently claimed that the delays were justified, although the specific reasons provided for these justifications were not detailed in the summaries.
A notable pattern emerged where the builder's claims of justified delays did not resonate with the Authority. Across the board, the decisions favored the applicants, …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!