PASHWA DEVELOPERS

Introduction

When considering real estate investments, buyers often conduct thorough research on builders and developers. One such company is Pashwa Developers, a notable player in the Gujarat property market. In this blog post, we will delve into the legal history of Pashwa Developers, analyzing their track record of complaints, cases won, and lost to provide potential buyers with a clear understanding of their operational integrity.

Overview of Pashwa Developers

Pashwa Developers has a recorded total of two complaints, and regrettably, they have lost both cases, marking their legal standing as concerning. The two cases highlight essential issues surrounding compliance with regulatory standards, which we will discuss in detail below.

Legal Case Review

Lost Cases

1. Case Summary：
   • Appellant Claim: The promoter asserted that they had submitted the annual audit report required by law. However, it was claimed that no such document was available on the GujRERA portal.
   • …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Pashwa Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key points across the disputes raised. The primary theme in the reported case revolves around the builder's non-compliance with the Real Estate Regulatory Act (RERA).

The case that was summarized illustrates this theme, wherein the appellant claimed where the builder had violated the RERA Act by selling a flat without proper registration. The builder's defense—that they were unaware of the law and had no intention to violate it—was insufficient to mitigate the penalty imposed by the authority, which amounted to Rs. 2 lakhs.

Common reasons for bringing cases against Pashwa Developers include regulatory non-compliance, as highlighted by the failure to register properties before sale. This indicates a pattern where the builder may have been operating without adequate legal counsel or adherence to established regulations, leading to legal consequences.

The builder’s loss in these …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder Pashwa Developers which it lost reveals significant insights into the challenges the builder faced, particularly surrounding regulatory compliance and submission requirements.

The cases can be grouped under three common themes:

1. Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements: This theme encompasses claims related to missed submissions and procedural adherence. Specifically, the builder's failure to provide necessary documentation—such as the annual audit report—is indicative of a broader trend of non-compliance with regulatory standards.
2. Penalties for Missing Submissions: The builder encountered penalties largely due to missed deadlines for important reports. The authority's imposition of a penalty for failing to submit the annual audit report on time demonstrates a strict adherence to regulatory timelines by the governing bodies.
3. Disputes Over Audit Reports: This theme reflects the builder's claims regarding disputes over the submission of audit reports. In the examined case, the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis