| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to investing in property, choosing the right builder is crucial. Pasupatinath Builders and Developers, primarily operating in Madhya Pradesh, presents a case worth examining. This post delves into their performance, particularly in legal challenges, offering insights to potential buyers.
Overview of Pasupatinath Builders and Developers
Pasupatinath Builders and Developers has faced a series of ten legal complaints, all of which resulted in losses for the builder. With no cases won, it’s essential to explore the nature of these disputes to understand the implications for customers.
Analysis of Legal Cases
Common Patterns in Lost Cases
A consistent theme emerges from the complaints against Pasupatinath Builders and Developers:
- Delayed Possession: All complaints revolved around the failure to hand over possession of flats despite customers paying between 85-95% of the total price. This indicates a significant issue with project timelines and delivery.
- Response to Claims: The builder attributed delays …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Pasupatinath Builders and Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their business practices and the challenges faced by their clients.
The cases primarily revolve around two key themes: Delayed Possession Claims and Penalties for Project Delays. In each instance of the delayed possession claims, the applicants stated that they had paid a substantial portion of the flat price (ranging from 85% to 95%) yet faced prolonged waiting periods without any resolution or possession of their flats. The builder consistently attributed these delays to unforeseen circumstances and claimed to have made diligent efforts to expedite the projects. However, the authorities did not accept this defense and ultimately imposed penalties.
A striking pattern emerges from these cases: the common trigger for litigation was the builder’s inability to adhere to promised timelines and fulfill their contractual obligations regarding possession delivery. This suggests …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!