| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When considering investments in real estate, understanding the reputation and legal standing of builders is crucial. In this post, we will delve into the specifics of Pat Infrastructure, a builder operating in Haryana, evaluating their performance through legal cases and providing tips for potential buyers.
Overview of Pat Infrastructure
Pat Infrastructure has a single complaint recorded against them, with a notable success in the legal arena—they have won 1 case and have not lost any. This indicates a relatively positive standing, but there is one particular lost case worthy of further examination as it could reflect practices worth noting for potential buyers.
Legal Case Insights
Cases Filed Against Pat Infrastructure
- Total Cases Lost: 1
- Overview of the Lost Case: The following details outline the situation of the lost case:
- Appellant’s Claim: The appellant asserted that Pat Infrastructure failed to register their project with the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Pat Infrastructure, which the builder won, revealed the following information. These cases primarily fell under several recurring themes, including Regulatory Compliance, Claims and Defenses, and Project Management Disputes.
The cases often revolved around regulatory compliance, specifically related to the registration of projects with the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (HRERA). In one significant case, the appellant claimed that Pat Infrastructure had failed to register their project with HRERA. However, the builder defended their stance by stating that they had not yet launched the project and thus were not required to register it at that stage. This illustrates a pattern where disputes emerge from misunderstandings of regulatory obligations.
Claims brought to court typically stemmed from contesting perceived penalties, allegations of project delays, or disagreements over regulatory compliance and land classification. Many buyers or opposing parties might have felt aggrieved …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!