No Logo Available

PATO INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Jharkhand
CINU70200WB2009PLC140172
Year EstablishedNot Available
Address66/01 KSHETRA MITRA LANE SALKIA , KOLKATA, West Bengal, India - 710006
Company StatusPublic

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the competitive real estate market of Jharkhand, Pato Infrastructure Limited has come to the surface with a notable track record characterized by a significant case that reveals both challenges and responsibilities regarding project completion and compliance. This blog post delves into the concerns associated with Pato Infrastructure Limited, its legal history, and offers insights for potential buyers considering investing in their projects.

Overview of Legal Cases

Pato Infrastructure Limited has faced a limited number of complaints, with only one notable case in which they lost. This indicates a relatively low level of legal disputes relative to many of their competitors. However, the details of this single case provide an essential glimpse into the builder's operations and customer satisfaction.

Summary of Complaints

The complaint lodged against Pato Infrastructure Limited was initiated by a complainant who alleged that the builder failed to complete the flat as promised and had not …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements Penalties for Project Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against Pato Infrastructure Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns in the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three main topics: delayed possession claims, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, and penalties for project delays.

The first type of case often revolved around the builder's failure to complete projects on time, which led to multiple claims from buyers seeking timely possession of their flats. In one notable case, the complainant asserted that the builder had not completed the flat and had failed to register the project with JHARERA. This case highlights a common reason for dissatisfaction among buyers, which often stems from delays attributed to the builder's inability to meet deadlines or fulfill contractual obligations.

Non-compliance with regulatory requirements emerged as another significant theme. Buyers reported instances where the builder did not adhere to the necessary legal frameworks, particularly concerning …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review