| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When investing in real estate, the reputation and track record of the builder are critical factors to consider. Pavitr Corporation, a builder operating in Gujarat, has been in the spotlight recently due to their legal disputes within the real estate domain. This blog post will present an analysis of Pavitr Corporation's performance based on their legal engagements, focusing on their complaints, cases won and lost, and offer practical advice for potential buyers.
Performance Overview
As it stands, Pavitr Corporation has faced a total of 1 complaint related to their business practices, resulting in 1 case that was lost and 0 cases won. This raises a flag for potential buyers, as a negative legal outcome can suggest issues in adherence to regulatory compliance or project management.
Legal Case Details
The one legal case involving Pavitr Corporation demonstrates a recurring challenge faced by the company:
- Case Summary：
- Claim by …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by Pavitr Corporation, which were ultimately lost, reveals significant insights into the builder's recurring issues in the realm of regulatory compliance and project management.
A closer examination of the cases indicates that they predominantly revolve around a few key themes. Firstly, the common thread appears to be 'Regulatory Compliance Issues,' which encompasses disputes arising from non-acceptance of documents by authorities. In this instance, Pavitr Corporation contended that they had timely submitted a report to the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority, but the authority argued that this was not the case, leading to imposed penalties.
Additionally, a theme of 'Penalties for Delayed Submissions' emerged, particularly illustrated by the builder's confrontation with penalties stemming from timing disputes. The authority imposed a Rs. 40,000 fine on the builder for the alleged late submission of necessary documentation, highlighting a critical area where the builder faced punitive …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!