| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When considering a property investment, it is crucial to evaluate the builder's reputation, legal history, and project compliance. In this article, we closely examine PDA Omaxe, a builder with projects in Punjab, analyzing their legal track record through complaints and cases.
Legal Overview
PDA Omaxe has faced a total of 2 complaints, both of which they have won. However, it is important to note that the builder has been involved in 2 cases where they were declared to have lost. In both instances, the complainants associated the builder's failures with non-compliance regarding the delivery of flats and issues related to project registration with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA).
Case Details
- First Case: The complainant alleged that the possession of a flat was not provided within the stipulated 3 years. In response, PDA Omaxe argued that the complaint was not applicable because the project wasn't registered with RERA. The …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, PDA Omaxe, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The cases primarily revolved around themes of "Delay in Possession" where buyers claimed that possession of their flats was not granted within the promised time period. Despite making the required payments, buyers expressed their frustration and sought various forms of relief, including stopping further demands for payment and requesting compensation for delays. Another prevalent theme was "Regulatory Non-compliance," where complaints were raised on the basis that the projects were not registered with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA).
The reasons for these cases reaching the courts were commonly centered around disputes about delays in possession and disagreements regarding payment demands. Buyers felt aggrieved by what they perceived as unjustified delays and sought legal recourse, believing they were entitled to compensation or a guarantee for possession dates. However, a pattern emerged indicating …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!