PENGUIN HOMES PRIVATE LTD logo

PENGUIN HOMES PRIVATE LTD

4.0/5 (13 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Odisha
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

An In-Depth Look at Penguin Homes Private Ltd: Prospects and Pitfalls

Penguin Homes Private Ltd has become a notable name in the housing sector of Odisha, but like any builder, it comes with a mix of accolades and controversies. In this blog post, we will delve into the complaints raised against the company, analyze legal cases involving them, and provide insights for potential homebuyers.

Understanding the Landscape: Complaints and Legal Cases

With a total of 13 complaints registered against Penguin Homes, the company has faced its fair share of challenges. Out of these, they have won 2 cases while suffering losses in 11 cases. A closer examination of these cases reveals key insights into the builder's operational conduct.

Cases Lost by the Builder

Patterns and Common Factors:
  • Failure to Comply with Procedural Norms: The builder lost three cases wherein appellants argued that they were not given adequate opportunities …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Municipal Orders Penalties for Project Delays Refund Disputes

Analysis of the cases filed against Penguin Homes Private Ltd, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes faced by the builder. The cases can be broadly categorized into four topics: Delayed Possession Claims, Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, Penalties for Project Delays, and Refund Disputes.

The majority of the cases revolved around Delayed Possession Claims, where the complainants alleged that the builder failed to hand over possession of their flats on time. In these cases, the builder consistently claimed to have canceled the allotments and refunded the amounts paid, yet the verdicts favored the complainants, indicating a systemic issue in the builder's fulfillment of contractual obligations.

Several cases also highlighted Penguin Homes' Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, resulting in substantial penalties imposed by the authority. The builder's failure to obtain necessary registration certificates and adhere to the directions provided by …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Ex Parte Orders and Hearing Rights Claims of Insufficient Opportunity to Contest Disputes Over Due Process in Hearings

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Penguin Homes Private Ltd, which it lost, revealed notable patterns centered on issues of due process and the builder's perceived injustices regarding ex parte orders. One recurring theme across the cases is the builder's contention that they were not granted sufficient opportunity to file show cause and participate in hearings. This lack of perceived opportunity has led to numerous legal challenges aimed at setting aside these ex parte orders.

Diving deeper into these themes, we observe that a predominant reason for the builder initiating these cases is the assertion of unfair practices in the hearing process. Specifically, they argue against the proper notification and opportunity to contest decisions, suggesting a systematic issue with how hearings are conducted or communicated.

Common triggers for the builder's litigation often stem from dissatisfaction with decisions made during these hearings, particularly those perceived as unjust due …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Harassment and Cheating Claims Contractual Violations

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The disputes primarily centered around claims of harassment and cheating by the complainants, along with the builder's defense that these complainants had violated the terms and conditions of their agreements. These themes suggest that many complaints arise from misunderstandings or disagreements regarding contract obligations.

A deeper look reveals that cases were predominantly brought to court by buyers who felt wronged and sought compensation related to issues of perceived harassment and cheating. However, a notable pattern emerges: these claims often stem from disputes over contract adherence. The recurring nature of these complaints indicates that while buyers have legitimate grievances, there can also be misunderstandings regarding the terms they agreed to.

The builder's success in these cases can be attributed to several factors, including a lack of sufficient evidence presented by the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review