PERAMBUR ROYAL PALACE FLAT OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION
- States Active In: Tamil Nadu
| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the dynamic landscape of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for potential homeowners. One such entity making its mark in Tamil Nadu is the Perambur Royal Palace Flat Owners Welfare Association (PRP-FOWA). With a noteworthy record in legal disputes, PRP-FOWA offers insights into the builder's reliability and accountability.
Legal Case Overview
PRP-FOWA has faced two significant legal cases, both of which resulted in victories for the complainants. Below is a summary of these cases:
- Case Summary: In both instances, the Complainant Association alleged that the Respondent Builder constructed the building without the required approval, deviated from the approved plan, and exhibited defects within the structure. The Respondent Builder countered by asserting that the Complainant had suppressed facts and highlighted an ongoing writ petition against the Corporation of Chennai.
- Verdict: In each case, the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA) directed the builder to …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Perambur Royal Palace Flat Owners Welfare Association, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolved around issues of construction approvals and claims regarding construction defects. The builder's cases often centered on allegations from the Complainant Association that construction was carried out without the necessary approvals, deviations from approved plans, and the existence of defects in the buildings themselves.
Interestingly, the builder consistently contested the claims by asserting that the Complainant Association suppressed critical facts and engaged in legal proceedings against the Corporation of Chennai. This indicates a pattern where the builder feels wrongfully accused and misrepresented.
One of the main reasons the builder won these cases appears to be the inadequate evidence provided by the opposing party. The court often sided with the builder, directing them to rectify the defects and complete construction according to the approved …
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!