PHOENIX INFRA ESTATE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- States Active In: Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh
| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the bustling landscape of real estate in India, one name that surfaces in discussions about credibility and accountability among builders is PHOENIX INFRA ESTATE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED. This blog post dives into the legal track record of the builder, taking into account a highly alarming ratio of complaints to successful cases. We’ll also provide insights for potential buyers to help them navigate the complexities of purchasing property.
Overview of Complaints and Legal Cases
PHOENIX INFRA ESTATE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED has faced a staggering 92 complaints, with a dismal record of only 1 case won against 91 cases lost. This translates to an unsettling success rate, raising concerns about the builder's reliability and commitment to fulfilling contractual obligations. The majority of their legal battles have occurred in Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh.
Analysis of Legal Patterns
Common Factors in Lost Cases
Examining the cases that PHOENIX INFRA has …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Phoenix Infra Estate International Limited, where the builder lost, reveals a concerning pattern of legal disputes primarily revolving around delayed possession, unexecuted sale deeds, and dissatisfaction with development progress.
The cases can be broadly categorized into several themes:
- Delayed Possession Claims: Many applicants claimed that despite having paid in full, they were not provided with possession of their plots or flats. This was often attributed to the builder's failure to complete development work as promised.
- Failure to Execute Sale Deeds: Many claims revolved around the builder's failure to execute sale deeds, which is critical in transferring ownership to buyers. This left purchasers in a lurch, without legal recourse to their investment.
- Disputes over Payment and Refunds: Several cases highlighted disputes between buyers and the builder over payments made. Buyers often claimed they had paid in full, …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder PHOENIX INFRA ESTATE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, which it lost, revealed several key insights into the nature of the disputes and the reasons for their unfavorable outcomes.
The cases can be grouped into a few major themes:
- Regulatory Compliance Issues: One of the primary themes involves the builder's challenges with regulations under the RERA Act. In the case where the applicant was ruled not an allottee, it highlights issues related to compliance with legal classifications and the rights allotted to different stakeholders in real estate transactions.
- Withdrawal of Claims and Allottee Status: The cases demonstrated attempts by the builder to withdraw claims and re-submit new applications. However, the rejection of such pleas in court points to the strict adherence to regulations regarding who qualifies as an allottee and the requirements for filing applications under RERA.
- Disputes Over Allottee Rights: …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. Several disputes arise in the real estate sector, and in the case of PHOENIX INFRA ESTATE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, these can be grouped under a few common themes: Unpaid Construction Work, Fraudulent Document Claims, and Regulatory Compliance Disputes.
Each theme represents different kinds of cases that were presented against the builder. The claims of unpaid construction work indicate dissatisfaction mainly related to payments for services rendered; however, the builder was able to counter these claims effectively. Another notable aspect is the allegations involving fraudulent document preparation, which points towards serious accusations made regarding the transparency and integrity of documentation involved in transactions. Lastly, regulatory compliance disputes suggest conflicts relating to adherence to legal frameworks, particularly concerning the RERA Act.
Many cases were brought to court by opposing parties, primarily contesting payments, …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!