PINK CITY DEVELOPERS logo

PINK CITY DEVELOPERS

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Jharkhand
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the evolving real estate market of Jharkhand, potential homebuyers have a plethora of options at their disposal. However, it is crucial to evaluate developers thoroughly before making a purchase. One such key player in the market is Pink City Developers. This blog post aims to provide an analysis of Pink City Developers based on their legal performance and other relevant factors.

Overview of Legal Performance

Pink City Developers has faced legal scrutiny, registering a total of 1 complaint against them. Unfortunately for the builder, they have not been successful in court, with 1 case lost and 0 cases won. The significance of these numbers cannot be overstated, as they reflect on the builder's ability to adhere to commitments and handle disputes.

Details of Legal Cases

The key case filed against Pink City Developers involved:

  • Appellant Claim: The complainant sought a refund amounting to Rs. 22,96,000 due to delayed …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Payment Disputes Compensation Claims

Analysis of the cases filed against Pink City Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around delayed possession claims, payment disputes, and compensation claims.

Many of the complaints made by the plaintiffs in these cases were centered around the builder's failure to deliver possession of flats on time, leading to significant emotional and financial distress for the buyers. Plaintiffs often sought substantial refunds, such as the complainant who sought a refund of Rs. 22,96,000, along with compensation for the delay.

Payment disputes emerged as another common theme, with the builder frequently claiming that buyers had defaulted on their payments. However, the verdicts suggest that the builder's defenses in this regard were not compelling, as evidenced by the adjudicating officer's decision to order a refund along with interest and compensation in the aforementioned case.

The reasons people brought cases to …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review