No Logo Available

PINNACLE DE DREAM

3.8/5 (6 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Madhya Pradesh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the dynamic world of real estate, understanding the reputation of a builder is crucial before making a significant investment. This blog post shines a light on Pinnacle de Dream, a builder operating in Madhya Pradesh, by analyzing their legal track record, particularly focusing on complaints and the outcomes of those cases.

Overview of Pinnacle de Dream

Pinnacle de Dream has faced a total of 6 complaints, with a significant legal outcome of 0 cases won and 6 cases lost. This alarming statistic raises questions about the builder’s business practices and the overall customer satisfaction associated with their projects.

Legal Case Details

Most of the cases filed against Pinnacle de Dream follow a similar pattern. Here’s a summary of these cases:

  • Claim Summary: All 6 complaints involved applicants who claimed to have filed problems against the builder but later withdrew them. They stated that they had …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
False Complaint Allegations Complaint Withdrawal and Investigation

Analysis of the cases filed against Pinnacle de Dream, where the builder lost, revealed several key points of interest. Notably, the cases primarily revolved around two themes: false complaint allegations and the subsequent withdrawal of complaints along with investigations into their origins.

The first theme, false complaint allegations, accounted for all the cases summarized. In each instance, the applicants claimed to have filed complaints against the builder, only to later withdraw them and assert that they had never actually submitted any complaint application. The builder, in their defense, also claimed that the applicants had made false allegations, highlighting a significant communication or credibility issue between the parties involved.

The common trigger for these cases appears to be a misunderstanding or miscommunication regarding the submission of complaints. It remains unclear what prompted the applicants to initially claim they had filed complaints, but the consistent pattern of withdrawal and denial suggests a …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review