| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the ever-evolving landscape of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for potential homebuyers. One such builder is Pitambara Infrastructure Private Limited, which has been the subject of scrutiny due to its legal battle history. This blog post explores the builder's track record based on available data, providing insights for prospective buyers.
Overview of Pitambara Infrastructure Private Limited
Pitambara Infrastructure Private Limited primarily operates in Madhya Pradesh. With a modest number of complaints against them—2 in total—it's essential to delve deeper into the outcomes of these complaints to assess the builder's reliability.
Legal Case Details
Cases Filed Against the Builder:
- Total Complaints: 2
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 2
The complaints against Pitambara Infrastructure highlight serious issues, particularly related to construction delays and non-delivery of possession. Here’s a summary of the claims:
- Case Summary: Both cases revolved around the same core issue: applicants claimed that the builder …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Pitambara Infrastructure Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the applicants. The primary disputes can be categorized into 'Delayed Possession Claims' and the builder's defense based on 'Unforeseen Circumstances,' along with the recurring issue of 'Compensation for Non-Compliance' with the promised delivery timelines.
The cases exemplify a pattern where the applicants primarily claimed delays in construction and a lack of possession despite having completed their payment obligations. In response, the builder consistently attributed these delays to unforeseen circumstances and sought to deflect responsibility by suggesting a lack of cooperation from the applicants. However, the Authority did not accept this defense and ultimately ordered the builder to expedite construction and pay compensation, indicating a failure on the builder's part to meet contractual obligations and comply with regulatory requirements.
A common trigger for litigation in these cases was …
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!