| CIN | U01112RJ2017PTC057615 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | PLOT NO. - 165, 2 P.T.M., JAWAHAR NAGAR SULTANA, TEHSIL MOHANGARH JAISALMER Jaisalmer RJ 345001 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When considering a property developer, understanding their legal track record can be crucial for potential buyers. PITHEWALA AGRO PRODUCT AND MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED is one such builder operating primarily in Rajasthan. In this post, we’ll delve into their legal history, analyze patterns in their complaints won and lost, and provide valuable tips for prospective buyers.
Builder Overview
PITHEWALA AGRO PRODUCT AND MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED has a relatively clean legal slate, with only one filed complaint to date. Impressively, they have won all legal cases filed against them, with a total of 1 case won and none lost. This can establish a level of trust for potential buyers in terms of legal reliability.
Legal Case Insights
Cases Lost
The builder has one notable case where they lost. The details are as follows:
- The appellant did not provide a claim, but the respondent claimed that all 7 pending QPRs (Quarterly Progress …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, PITHEWALA AGRO PRODUCT AND MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The cases primarily revolved around themes such as Regulatory Compliance and Disputes over Submitted Documentation. Specifically, the opposing parties claimed compliance issues with pending Quality Performance Reports (QPRs) that had allegedly not been submitted, while the builder defended itself by proving that all required QPRs were submitted and accessible on the designated web portal.
Cases like these often emerge when clients contest penalties or express dissatisfaction regarding project timelines or documentation handling. The buyers typically filed complaints with claims they believed were valid assessments of the builder’s operational failures, contributing to a pattern of legal actions wherein buyers sought recourse for perceived mismanagement.
The reasons behind the builder's success in court often stemmed from substantiated evidence in favor of the builder. In …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!