CIN | U93000DL2009PTC194688 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | A-16/B-1, MOHAN CO-OPERATIVE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, MAIN MATHURA ROAD, , NEW DELHI, Delhi, India - 110044 |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When investing in real estate, especially in new developments, choosing the right builder is crucial for a smooth home-buying experience. One such builder is Piyush Facility Management Private Limited, which has drawn attention due to several legal challenges. This post will delve into the builder's track record, analyzing their legal disputes, and providing insights for potential buyers.
Builder Overview
Piyush Facility Management Private Limited operates exclusively in the state of Haryana. However, their reputation has been marred by numerous complaints and legal cases. With a total of 5 complaints lodged against them, they have lost all cases, raising concerns about their business practices.
Legal Case Details
- Overview of Complaints: All 5 complaints against Piyush Facility Management pertain to issues such as delays in the possession of flats, illegal demands, and perceived deficiencies in their offerings. The recurring theme in these disputes is the dissatisfaction expressed by customers regarding …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Piyush Facility Management Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes surrounding their dealings. The cases primarily revolved around three critical issues: delayed possession claims, illegal demands and deficiencies, and payment disputes.
The majority of the cases (four out of five) focused on delayed possession claims, where the complainants alleged that the builder had failed to deliver their flats on time, causing considerable inconvenience and loss. These claims often overlapped with allegations of illegal demands, with complainants asserting that the builder had made unreasonable financial requests beyond the agreed-upon purchase price. The builder's defense typically countered these claims by arguing that delays were attributable to the complainants' failure to pay the balance amount owed, but this defense did not stand in court.
Payment disputes emerged as a central theme in all cases. The builder consistently claimed that …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!