PLATINUM BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS logo

PLATINUM BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Rajasthan
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the ever-evolving real estate market, potential buyers must do their due diligence when selecting a builder. One of the players in the Rajasthan real estate sector is Platinum Builders and Developers. This blog post delves into the legal history surrounding this builder, analyzing their performance in various cases and providing insights for prospective buyers.

Legal Background

Platinum Builders and Developers has faced scrutiny, having a total of one complaint lodged against them. To date, they have not won any cases but have a singular case that concluded with a loss. Here we break down the details:

Case Summary

The one legal case involved the following claims:

  • Appellant Claim: Deficiencies in construction and non-handover of utility areas to the Residents Welfare Society.
  • Respondent Claim: The builder claimed exemption for registration of the ongoing project, asserting lack of documentary proof for exemption, and reported that the possession of the flat …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Construction Deficiencies Non-Compliance with Statutory Obligations Disputes over Project Registration and Handover

Analysis of the cases filed against Platinum Builders and Developers, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into their legal disputes. The cases can be grouped into three primary themes: construction deficiencies, non-compliance with statutory obligations, and disputes over project registration and handover.

The first theme, construction deficiencies, highlights the builder's failure to ensure that their projects met the required standards. In one notable case, the Residents Welfare Society claimed that there were deficiencies in construction and that the builder had not handed over the utility area, which is essential for the proper functioning of the community. This indicates a pattern where the builder may have prioritized profit over the quality of construction and the fulfillment of contractual obligations to provide complete and usable facilities to homebuyers.

The second theme revolves around the builder's non-compliance with statutory obligations. The lack of registration for the project, as mandated by law, demonstrates …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review