CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the dynamic world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for potential buyers. Today, we turn our attention to POOJA DEVELOPERS, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat, to analyze its performance and legal history.
POOJA DEVELOPERS has a relatively clean legal record, with only one complaint filed against them and that case ultimately won in favor of the builder. However, there is one significant case they lost, which gives us important insights into their operations and customer relations.
In summary, POOJA DEVELOPERS maintains a reasonable legal track record, with only one complaint against them. Their presence in the Gujarat real estate market appears stable, but potential buyers should approach with caution, particularly in areas related to possession and project timelines.
By following these guidelines and keeping an eye on POOJA DEVELOPERS’ standing, potential buyers can make informed decisions about their real estate investments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, POOJA DEVELOPERS, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolved around a few recurring themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, Disputes over Financial Obligations, and Regulatory Compliance Issues. These themes emerged as common areas of contention between the buyers and the builder.
One of the most prevalent types of disputes was related to Delayed Possession Claims, where buyers contested their lack of possession despite having paid the full price. Additionally, disputes over Financial Obligations arose, often linked to payment schedules and claims of unfulfilled financial commitments by either party. Regulatory Compliance Issues also surfaced, particularly regarding the builder's adherence to municipal regulations and necessary permissions.
The primary reasons for filing these cases typically included contesting delays, claims of inaccurate project completion timelines, or disagreements over financial transactions. A noteworthy pattern emerged; many buyers exhibited misunderstandings of the contractual obligations or failed to comply with the entire agreement, which led to disputes.
In examining why POOJA DEVELOPERS won these cases, it becomes evident that many victories stemmed from the opposing party's insufficient evidence, misinterpretations of legal obligations, and non-compliance with directives related to documentation and regulations. The builder demonstrated an effective defense, often highlighted by the opposing party's inability to substantiate their claims, which sometimes appeared to be exaggerated or unfounded.
This analysis paints a picture of POOJA DEVELOPERS' reputation within the broader real estate market. It suggests that while there are genuine grievances in real estate transactions, there is also a risk of false accusations, as seen in these outcomes. This reinforces the notion that builders can and do defend themselves successfully against unjust claims, showcasing their commitment to uphold their contractual obligations.
To potential buyers, it's crucial to make informed decisions when entering into contractual obligations with builders. While findings indicate that builders like POOJA DEVELOPERS can win disputes, it is vital for buyers to approach claims with a discerning eye. Proper due diligence and understanding of the contractual terms can prevent misunderstandings and ultimately lead to more fruitful engagements in the real estate market.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMP/Ahmedabad/18062… | Gujarat | The complainant demanded compensation for not rec… | ["Real Estate", "Po… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Kishan T. Ravani | Pooja Developers | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1D7gGK6701-uxx6RsWTt1Pbnq34kkT4_u |