| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding POOJA DEVELOPERS: A Comprehensive Analysis of Performance and Legal Standing
In the dynamic world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for potential buyers. Today, we turn our attention to POOJA DEVELOPERS, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat, to analyze its performance and legal history.
Overview of POOJA DEVELOPERS
POOJA DEVELOPERS has a relatively clean legal record, with only one complaint filed against them and that case ultimately won in favor of the builder. However, there is one significant case they lost, which gives us important insights into their operations and customer relations.
Examination of Legal Cases
Cases Lost
- Case Summary: In a notable case, the complainant claimed that after paying the full sale price for a flat, the possession was never handed over. The complainant sought compensation of Rs. 42,00,000/-. POOJA DEVELOPERS responded by stating that the possession was delayed due to their pending applications …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, POOJA DEVELOPERS, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolved around a few recurring themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, Disputes over Financial Obligations, and Regulatory Compliance Issues. These themes emerged as common areas of contention between the buyers and the builder.
One of the most prevalent types of disputes was related to Delayed Possession Claims, where buyers contested their lack of possession despite having paid the full price. Additionally, disputes over Financial Obligations arose, often linked to payment schedules and claims of unfulfilled financial commitments by either party. Regulatory Compliance Issues also surfaced, particularly regarding the builder's adherence to municipal regulations and necessary permissions.
The primary reasons for filing these cases typically included contesting delays, claims of inaccurate project completion timelines, or disagreements over financial transactions. A noteworthy pattern emerged; many buyers exhibited misunderstandings …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!