POOMALAI HOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 3
- States (Active in): Tamil Nadu
| CIN | U45201TN2007PTC062537 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 27 February 2007 |
| Address | VEL'S POOMALAI, PLOT NO.409-A, DOOR NO.7 6TH EAST STREET, KAMARAJ NAGAR, THIRUVAN MIYUR, , CHENNAI, Tamil Nadu, India - 600041 |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
Poomalai Housing Private Limited is a builder based primarily in Tamil Nadu, India. As a significant player in the real estate market, understanding the builder’s performance and history is crucial for potential home buyers. This blog aims to provide a detailed overview of Poomalai Housing, including relevant legal cases, common trends, and tips for buying property.
Legal Case Summary
Poomalai Housing has faced a total of three complaints, and troublingly, they have lost all three cases filed against them. Legal disputes often hint at deeper issues within management practices and quality assurance, warranting a closer look at the underlying factors.
Cases Overview
The appellants in all three cases claimed that Poomalai Housing failed to adhere to the Joint Development Agreement (JDA), which entails essential responsibilities such as registering projects with the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA), timely payments to local authorities, and maintaining construction quality.
The builders defended themselves by suggesting that the complainants were also promoters, thus asserting that the dispute fell beyond TNRERA's jurisdiction. Despite these claims, the TNRERA consistently found in favor of the complainants, emphasizing the need for Poomalai Housing to meet the outlined obligations—including ensuring project completion within 18 months of building permission and compliance with all terms of the JDA.
Analysis of Legal Patterns
Common Factors in Lost Cases
The cases Poomalai Housing lost demonstrate a recurring theme of non-compliance with contractual obligations stated in the JDA. A critical issue highlighted across all cases includes the failure to register the project with TNRERA and the alleged use of inferior construction materials. This pattern raises concerns about quality control and adherence to regulatory requirements.
Common Factors in Won Cases
Intriguingly, while there were no cases won by Poomalai Housing, the persistent defense strategy used was centered around jurisdictional claims. The company maintained that the legal complaints came from individuals with dual roles as promoters, suggesting potential personal disputes rather than construction-related malpractice. However, this strategy did not hold up in court, leading to directed actions from TNRERA for improvements.
Conclusion
The data on Poomalai Housing Private Limited presents a troubling view of their operational legitimacy and reliability. With three lost cases indicating serious compliance issues, potential buyers should approach with caution.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Take time to research not only the projects but also the builder's history of legal issues and complaints from previous buyers.
- Demand Transparency: Ask for detailed documentation regarding project approvals and timelines, as well as the quality standards applied during construction.
- Regular Updates: Stay updated on project progress and regulatory compliance by engaging directly with the builder and local authorities.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Check Reviews and Testimonials: Look for feedback from previous buyers and analyze patterns in their experiences.
- Verify Credentials: Ensure the builder has the required licenses and registrations with local authorities.
- Visit Completed Projects: Conduct on-site visits to see previously completed projects to gauge construction quality and adherence to design.
- Understand the Agreement: Before signing any contract, have it reviewed by a legal professional to ensure all aspects are in your favor and compliant with regulations.
In summary, while Poomalai Housing is a significant player in Tamil Nadu's real estate market, their legal history suggests caution is warranted for prospective buyers.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Poomalai Housing Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their business practices and legal disputes. The cases primarily revolved around four key themes: non-compliance with the Joint Development Agreement (JDA), failure to register with the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA), quality issues related to construction materials, and unpaid dues to the Chennai Corporation.
The first theme, non-compliance with JDA, emerged as a critical concern in all cases. The complainants, who were parties to the JDA, alleged that the builder failed to adhere to the agreed-upon terms, particularly concerning project registration and completion timelines. This highlights an overarching issue where the builder may have underestimated the importance of contractual obligations, leading to multiple litigation instances.
The failure to register with TNRERA is another recurring theme that demonstrated the builder’s disregard for regulatory requirements. Although the builder claimed to have obtained the necessary permissions and registrations, the TNRERA's decisions indicate otherwise, signaling a potential systemic issue within the company's compliance practices.
Additionally, there were frequent claims surrounding the inferior quality of construction materials used by the builder. This raises a significant concern about the builder's commitment to safety and durability, a critical aspect of real estate development that directly affects the homebuyers' satisfaction and well-being.
Lastly, the issue of unpaid dues to the Chennai Corporation suggests a financial negligence on the part of the builder, which could imply cash flow problems or a lack of financial planning, both of which could impact project delivery timelines and quality.
The patterns emerging from these cases indicate that homebuyers and business partners of Poomalai Housing were commonly driven to litigation due to the builder's failure to meet contractual obligations, comply with regulations, and ensure quality in construction. The builder's losses in these cases were primarily due to a combination of insufficient evidence to support their claims, non-compliance with the JDA and TNRERA requirements, and possibly an inability to fulfill their commitments related to construction quality and timely payment of dues.
In conclusion, while Poomalai Housing Private Limited may offer properties at competitive prices, potential buyers should exercise caution given the legal and operational challenges faced by the builder. It is essential for homebuyers to conduct thorough due diligence, which includes reviewing a builder's track record with TNRERA, past project completion timelines, and quality assurance practices before making any investment.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.Nos.257, 258 & 26… | Tamil Nadu | The complainants are the absolute owners of three… | ["Real Estate", "Jo… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha… | N. Mohan | Poomalai Housing Pr… | https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2021/257,258,267-2021.pdf |