No Logo Available

POTENTIAL DISTRIBUTORS PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Maharashtra
CINU51909WB2007PTC114531
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressArsuday Building, 4th Floor 63/3B Sarat Bose Road Kolkata Kolkata WB 700025 IN
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

When considering a builder for your upcoming project, it’s vital to assess their track record and performance in previous legal matters. This blog dives into the specifics of Potential Distributors Private Limited, providing insights into their operations, legal standing, and what potential buyers should consider.

Company Overview

Name: Potential Distributors Private Limited
State with Projects: Maharashtra
As a player in the construction industry, Potential Distributors Private Limited operates specifically within Maharashtra. Understanding their history, especially concerning complaints and legal disputes, is essential.

Legal Performance

Complaints and Cases

  • Number of Complaints: 1
  • Cases Won: 0
  • Cases Lost: 1
The single complaint against Potential Distributors highlights an absence of successful legal battles, as indicated by their record of zero cases won. This raises concerns about their responsiveness to client issues and overall operational integrity.

Details of the Lost Case

The following summarizes the legal proceedings involving Potential Distributors:
  • Claim by Appellant:

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Urgency Claims Non-claim by Respondents Lack of Evidence for Hearings Delay in Case Proceedings

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Potential Distributors Private Limited, which it lost, reveals several important insights into the nature and outcomes of these disputes.

Firstly, the cases tend to group around common themes that reflect the builder's primary legal challenges. One key theme is the "Urgency Claims," where the builder often sought expedited hearings to address their grievances. However, these claims were repeatedly disallowed due to a noticeable lack of demonstrable urgency. This repeated inability to establish urgency led to delays in proceedings, as exemplified by one case on the schedule for an affidavit of service in 2024.

Another recurring aspect includes the "Non-claim by Respondents," where the respondent parties refrained from making any claims, suggesting that there may have been an imbalance in the dispute dynamics. The absence of a substantive counter-claim could indicate that the builder was overly reliant on its urgencies …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review