POWERHILLS CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED logo

POWERHILLS CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Karnataka
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the competitive world of real estate, it's crucial to evaluate a builder's track record before making a purchase. Powerhills Construction Private Limited, with its operations predominantly in Karnataka, presents an interesting case for analysis. This post explores the builder's legal history, analyzing the complaints filed against them, and providing insights for potential buyers.

Overview of Powerhills Construction Private Limited

Powerhills Construction Private Limited is a builder operating in the state of Karnataka. Their reputation and performance in the market can be gauged through a review of their complaint history and legal outcomes.

Legal Case Details

Powerhills Construction has faced a total of 1 complaint, which resulted in the case being won by the builder. To break this down further:

  • Cases Filed: 1
  • Cases Won: 1
  • Cases Lost: 0

Summary of the Case:

In the sole complaint against Powerhills Construction, the details are as follows:

  • Appellant Claim: The …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Maintainability of Complaints Claims of Advance Payments Disputes Over Allottee Status

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Powerhills Construction Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed several important insights. The disputes primarily revolved around three key themes: the maintainability of complaints, claims of advance payments, and disputes over allottee status under the RERA Act.

In the cases reviewed, complainants frequently alleged financial disputes, stating that they had paid advance amounts towards marketing and development in relation to projects. However, the builder successfully defended itself on the grounds that the complainants lacked standing, claiming that they were neither allottees nor sufficiently aggrieved parties as defined by the RERA Act. This led to a series of dismissals based on the complaints being deemed not maintainable.

The motivations behind these cases often stemmed from misunderstandings about roles and rights under the RERA framework, as well as concerns over financial transactions that may not have been supported by adequate documentation. …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review