| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the realm of real estate and construction, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth property purchase experience. This blog delves into Prabhakar Corrosion Company, examining their legal history, customer complaints, and what potential buyers should consider before making a decision.
Overview of Prabhakar Corrosion Company
Prabhakar Corrosion Company, as indicated by the data available, operates primarily within Madhya Pradesh. However, the company has faced some challenges, evident from their legal history and customer complaints.
Legal Case Analysis
1. Case Summary
Prabhakar Corrosion Company has faced one complaint, which culminated in a legal case.
- Appellant Claim: The applicant accused the company of failing to complete the development work for their plot and not refunding the consideration amount despite multiple requests.
- Respondent Claim: The company contended that the applicant did not adhere to the provisions of the RERA Act, which negated their eligibility for a …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Prabhakar Corrosion Company, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around incomplete development claims, refund disputes, and non-compliance with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) Act.
Many of the cases involve claims from buyers that the builder failed to complete development work on their plots. This points to a significant area of dissatisfaction among customers, who expect timely and full delivery of projects. The builder's inability to meet these expectations created a legal backlog, with buyers seeking recourse through the courts to obtain refunds and compensation.
The reason people commonly brought cases to court was primarily to contest the builder's refusal to return the consideration amount after failing to deliver on development promises. Buyers argued that the builder's non-compliance with the RERA Act meant that they were entitled to refunds, which further fueled the litigation. A pattern …
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!