No Logo Available

PRABHAVATHI INFRASTRUCTURES

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Karnataka
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Understanding PRABHAVATHI INFRASTRUCTURES: A Builder's Reputation in Karnataka

When it comes to property investments, selecting the right builder can significantly influence the overall satisfaction and success of your investment. Today, we dive into PRABHAVATHI INFRASTRUCTURES, a builder known for its operations in Karnataka.

Complaints and Legal Standing

PRABHAVATHI INFRASTRUCTURES has received a total of 1 complaint, which reflects a generally positive standing in the market. The builder has managed to win that single case, signaling a robust defense against allegations. This paints a picture of accountability and professionalism typically desirable in the construction industry.

Case Details: A Closer Look at the Legal Challenge

Complaints Against the Builder

  • Total Complaints: 1
  • Cases Won: 1
  • Cases Lost: 0

Summary of the Complaint

The singular complaint against PRABHAVATHI INFRASTRUCTURES involved claims from the complainant, asserting that the builder had failed to pay the due bank amount and had not resolved the issue. In …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Financial Disputes Claims of Non-Payment Contractual Settlements

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, PRABHAVATHI INFRASTRUCTURES, which the builder won, revealed interesting insights into the nature of disputes and the builder's defense strategies. The cases predominantly revolved around financial disputes where opposing parties claimed non-payment and issues regarding settlements, placing the builder in a position to defend against accusations of financial negligence.

  1. Financial Disputes: Many of the disputes against the builder arose over claims of non-payment of dues, particularly concerning bank amounts owed. The opposing parties typically alleged that the builder had neglected their financial obligations, which led to substantial claims and withdrawal complaints once payment was realized.
  2. Claims of Non-Payment: In specific cases, the complainants expressed frustration over perceived unpaid amounts, hinting at potential miscommunication or misunderstanding of the settlement statuses. The clarity in transactions and timely settlements played a pivotal role in mitigating potential escalations into lengthy legal …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review