No Logo Available

PRAFUL GADGE

3.8/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Madhya Pradesh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

When choosing a builder for your next property investment, it's crucial to conduct thorough research to ensure a positive purchasing experience. In this article, we will analyze the performance of Praful Gadge, a builder operating in Madhya Pradesh. We will discuss the complaints recorded against this builder, review the outcomes of legal cases, and provide helpful advice for potential buyers.

Overview of Complaints and Legal Cases

Praful Gadge has encountered a total of 2 complaints from clients, resulting in a 0% success rate in legal actions, as both cases filed against him were lost. These outcomes indicate a troubling trend for potential customers considering this builder.

Summary of Legal Cases

While both cases against Praful Gadge resulted in losses, they reveal significant issues in dealings related to property possession:

  1. Case One: An applicant sought compensation for the delay in receiving possession of a residential plot. The adjudicating officer …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Failure to Refund Payments Mental Distress and Compensation Claims

Analysis of the cases filed against builder Praful Gadge, which he lost, reveals significant insights into the recurring themes surrounding his legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three common themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Failure to Refund Payments, and Mental Distress and Compensation Claims.

The first type of case primarily involves claims made by buyers for delays in the possession of residential plots. In one notable case, the applicant sought compensation and interest for the delay, while the builder failed to provide a clear response. This lack of transparency and accountability ultimately led to the Adjudicating Officer awarding interest at 6% per annum and compensation for mental distress and expenses. Such outcomes highlight a pattern where builders may not take adequate responsibility for meeting project timelines, leading to financial and emotional repercussions for buyers.

The second theme revolves around the builder's failure to refund payments …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review