| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When choosing a property developer, understanding their history and reliability is crucial. In this post, we will focus on Prakash Estates, a builder operating in Maharashtra, and delve into its legal standing through the lens of recent complaints and case outcomes. We will summarize the relevant legal details and offer essential advice for potential buyers.
Overview of Complaints Against Prakash Estates
Prakash Estates has one recorded complaint against them, which is a significant point worth discussing in the context of buyer trust and company reliability.
Legal Case Examination
Case Summary
The single case filed against Prakash Estates highlights the dissatisfaction of a customer regarding possession of a flat. The appellant claimed that the builder failed to provide possession with the required occupancy certificate and also did not deliver the promised amenities. Consequently, the appellant sought a refund with interest.
On the other hand, the builder defended itself by arguing …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Prakash Estates, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: delayed possession claims, failure to provide amenities, and legal compliance and limitation issues.
The first type, delayed possession claims, involves the builder's inability to provide homeowners with possession of their flats within the agreed-upon timeframe, often compounded by a lack of necessary documentation such as occupancy certificates. In one notable case, the builder claimed to have completed the building on schedule and argued that the delay was attributable to the homeowner's fit-out requirements. However, the underlying issue of not securing an occupancy certificate, which is crucial for legal compliance and the buyers’ ability to fully move in, highlights a significant shortcoming on the builder’s part.
The second theme, failure to provide amenities, typically overlaps with the first as buyers often expect a …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!