| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the real estate market, making an informed decision about builders is imperative for potential homeowners. One such builder, PRAMUKH ASSOCIATES, has recently come into focus due to its legal performance and operational conduct. In this blog post, we will explore the complaints against PRAMUKH ASSOCIATES, their legal history, and what you might consider before deciding to invest.
Overview of Complaints and Legal Cases
PRAMUKH ASSOCIATES has faced one complaint that led to a legal case against them. The details of the case paint a concerning picture:
- The complaint involved allegations that the builder violated provisions of the Real Estate (Exchange and Development) Act, 2016 by selling units without proper registration with RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority).
- In this instance, the builder maintained that they had complied with all legal requirements, asserting that they did not violate any provisions of the Act.
- However, the Authority ruled against PRAMUKH …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Pramukh Associates, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The primary areas of contention can be categorized into non-compliance with RERA, violations of the Real Estate Act, and regulatory disputes.
In the case summarized, Pramukh Associates was found to have violated the provisions of the Real Estate (Exchange and Development) Act, 2016 by selling units without registration with RERA. This highlights a significant area of concern regarding the builder's adherence to regulatory requirements. The common theme of non-compliance with RERA is a recurring one in these cases, indicating a potential systematic issue within the builder's operations.
The reasons people brought cases to court primarily revolved around the builder’s failure to comply with the necessary legal frameworks, which raised concerns among buyers regarding the legitimacy and security of their investments. The builder's defense often contested the claims by arguing compliance, yet …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!