CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the real estate market, making an informed decision about builders is imperative for potential homeowners. One such builder, PRAMUKH ASSOCIATES, has recently come into focus due to its legal performance and operational conduct. In this blog post, we will explore the complaints against PRAMUKH ASSOCIATES, their legal history, and what you might consider before deciding to invest.
PRAMUKH ASSOCIATES has faced one complaint that led to a legal case against them. The details of the case paint a concerning picture:
In summary, PRAMUKH ASSOCIATES presents itself as a builder with a significant legal setback and no victories to showcase in their defense. The legal findings against them suggest a nonchalant attitude towards compliance with real estate regulations, which can spell potential trouble for buyers. For those considering purchasing a property from this builder, we recommend exercising caution. Here are some practical tips for prospective buyers:
By following these guidelines, you can safeguard your interests in the complex world of real estate investments. Proceed with due diligence when considering PRAMUKH ASSOCIATES or any other builder in the market.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Pramukh Associates, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The primary areas of contention can be categorized into non-compliance with RERA, violations of the Real Estate Act, and regulatory disputes.
In the case summarized, Pramukh Associates was found to have violated the provisions of the Real Estate (Exchange and Development) Act, 2016 by selling units without registration with RERA. This highlights a significant area of concern regarding the builder's adherence to regulatory requirements. The common theme of non-compliance with RERA is a recurring one in these cases, indicating a potential systematic issue within the builder's operations.
The reasons people brought cases to court primarily revolved around the builder’s failure to comply with the necessary legal frameworks, which raised concerns among buyers regarding the legitimacy and security of their investments. The builder's defense often contested the claims by arguing compliance, yet the outcomes reveal a consistent pattern of legal violations, leading to financial penalties and a tarnished reputation for the builder.
The builder lost these cases predominantly due to their inability to meet regulatory standards and comply with the Real Estate Act. The imposition of a fine in the cited case demonstrates not only the legal obligations that builders have under RERA but also the serious consequences of non-compliance. These patterns suggest that buyers should approach investments with caution when considering builders with a history of such legal issues.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GJ/CMP/SM/Gandhinag… | Gujarat | The promoter-developer of the 'Tangent' project w… | ["Violation of RERA… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Pramukh Associates | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1ZuQe5s_bgxuF9gXx2kJvNM_62ZXnfaLO |