No Logo Available

PRAMUKH MASTANA ASSOCIATES

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Understanding Pramukh Mastana Associates: A Builder's Legal Standing and What It Means for Buyers

Introduction

When considering a property investment, the reputation and reliability of the builder play a crucial role in the decision-making process. In this blog post, we will take a closer look at Pramukh Mastana Associates, a builder operating in Gujarat. We will evaluate their legal standing through their complaint history and provide insights for potential buyers.

Builder Overview

Name: Pramukh Mastana Associates
States with Projects: Gujarat
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1

Legal Case Analysis

Pattern in Cases Lost

Pramukh Mastana Associates has one case on record where they lost. The case involved a complaint that the builder did not provide shops and offices of the correct size as per the undertaking dated October 30, 2018. This indicates a potential issue with misrepresentation or failure to adhere to stated commitments. It highlights …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Disputes over Project Deliverables Non-compliance with Undertakings and Plans

Analysis of the cases filed against Pramukh Mastana Associates, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties involved. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: Disputes over Project Deliverables and Non-compliance with Undertakings and Plans.

The cases often involve situations where the builder failed to deliver shops and offices consistent with the sizes stated in their undertakings. For instance, in one significant complaint, the builder was accused of not providing shops and offices of the same size as outlined in an undertaking dated October 30, 2018. The builder's defense revolved around their claim of adherence to an approved plan from May 2, 2019, yet the RERA Authority ruled against them, ordering the builder to fulfill their commitment without any reductions.

A common trigger for these disputes is the builder's inability to meet the expectations set during the purchase …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review