| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
If you're considering purchasing a property, choosing the right builder is crucial. In this post, we delve into the record of Pranayata Park Co-operative Housing Society Limited, a builder operating in Gujarat, examining their legal history to provide an informed perspective for potential homebuyers.
Legal Record Overview
Pranayata Park Co-operative Housing Society Limited has faced significant legal challenges, with a total of 2 complaints lodged against them. Unfortunately, they have lost all of these cases, totaling 0 cases won and 2 cases lost. The nature of these complaints sheds light on the builder's operational challenges and may raise red flags for potential investors.
Case Analysis
Common Patterns in Lost Cases
Both cases that Pranayata Park faced revolved around similar issues: the failure to obtain Building Use (B.U.) Permission and the associated maintenance charges. In both instances:
- Claim for Compensation: The complainants sought compensation for not receiving necessary …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Pranayata Park Co-operative Housing Society Limited, which it lost, revealed several important insights about their litigation patterns. These cases primarily centered around two significant themes: Compensation Claims for B.U. Permission and disputes over Maintenance Charges.
In terms of Compensation Claims, the builder consistently sought to claim compensation for the failure to obtain necessary B.U. (Building Use) Permissions. This indicates a recurring issue with adherence to regulatory requisites, where the builder's ability to secure approvals from municipal authorities was questioned. Additionally, disputes over Maintenance Charges highlight the builder's attempts to contest fees associated with property upkeep, which suggests ongoing friction in maintaining property standards post-sale.
The common reason the builder brought these cases to court appears to stem from a desire to challenge the financial implications of these setbacks. The builder often contested penalties or claimed that delays or non-compliance were due …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!