PRASHANTI NILAYAM DEVELOPERS logo

PRASHANTI NILAYAM DEVELOPERS

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Prashanti Nilayam Developers, operating primarily in Gujarat, has garnered attention in the real estate market for its legal history and operational track record. With only one complaint lodged against the builder, which they successfully defended, the company presents a unique case for potential buyers. This article examines the performance of Prashanti Nilayam Developers based on the available data, along with tips for prospective buyers when considering purchasing from this builder.

Legal Background

Complaints and Cases Summary

Prashanti Nilayam Developers has faced a total of one legal complaint. The details of the case are as follows:

  • Complainant's Claim: The complainant argued that the builder had cheated him by failing to register the project with GUJRERA and by not supplying the necessary documentation.
  • Builder's Response: The builder asserted that they had complied with registration requirements and provided all requisite documents to the complainant.
  • Final Verdict: Ultimately, the GUJRERA dismissed the complaint …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Non-compliance Claims Claims of Cheating and Fraud Documentation and Transparency Disputes

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes largely fell into a few recurring themes, which provide insight into the types of claims made by complainants and the defenses presented by Prashanti Nilayam Developers. These themes include Regulatory Non-compliance Claims, Claims of Cheating and Fraud, and Documentation and Transparency Disputes. Each of these themes encapsulates the kinds of legal challenges the builder has faced and the nature of grievances raised by parties opposing them.

Regulatory Non-compliance Claims often stemmed from allegations that the builder did not comply with necessary regulatory requirements, such as registering projects with GUJRERA. The claims indicated a belief among buyers that regulations were not met, leading to feelings of mistrust. In another instance, claims of documentation discrepancies emerged, where opposing parties accused the builder of failing to provide necessary project documentation. These complaints typically reflect …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review