| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder is paramount for ensuring a smooth home buying experience. Pratham Developers, operating primarily in Gujarat, serves as a notable case study on the importance of researching a builder's legal track record. In this blog post, we will delve into the builder’s history of legal claims, the outcomes of these cases, and insights for prospective buyers considering this company.
Pratham Developers: A Snapshot
Pratham Developers has faced a total of three complaints, with the noteworthy fact that they have not won any of the cases against them. Their legal history raises several red flags that potential buyers should consider seriously before making any commitments.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost by Pratham Developers
In one significant legal case where Pratham Developers was the appellant, it was argued that the project was complete and that an application had been made for a …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Pratham Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their legal disputes. The cases primarily revolve around two common themes: the failure to provide promised maintenance facilities and disputes over required deposits.
In each instance of the first theme, the complainants alleged that Pratham Developers had not delivered necessary maintenance facilities as promised. The builder, however, claimed to have provided all essential amenities and deposits, indicating a clear communication gap or misunderstanding regarding project obligations. The legal authority, GUJRERA, ruled against the builder by directing them to fulfill their commitments, highlighting the importance of adhering to promises made during property sales.
The recurring pattern in these cases demonstrates that one of the primary triggers for litigation involves the builder's inability or reluctance to meet the expected standards of maintenance and facility provision. This shortfall not only necessitates legal action from aggrieved buyers but …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Pratham Developers, which it lost, reveals significant insights into the nature of disputes and challenges faced by the builder. A key recurring theme across these cases is non-compliance with regulatory requirements, particularly related to the timely submission of reports. In one notable case, the builder contended that the project was completed and that the necessary application for the Certificate of Occupancy had been submitted to the Local Authority. However, the respondent argued that the builder had failed to comply with the reporting requirements, which ultimately led to a penalty being imposed.
This highlights the common disputes regarding delays in possession and the requirements set forth by governing authorities. The builder's cases indicate that they often sought recourse in court to contest penalties and defend against claims of project delays. The frequent litigation could be viewed as a strategy to mitigate …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!