PRATHAM INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the real estate sector, the reputation of a builder can significantly impact potential buyers' decisions. Pratham Infratech Private Limited has made its mark in the National Capital Territory of Delhi, but its track record raises questions worth exploring. This blog dives deep into the legal confrontations faced by the builder, shedding light on their outcomes and offering valuable insights for prospective buyers.

Overview of Legal Cases

Pratham Infratech Private Limited has been involved in four legal complaints, resulting in two cases won and two cases lost. The nature of these cases primarily revolves around allotment cancellations and possession disputes. Analyzing these disputes can help identify patterns that may influence future buyers' decisions.

Cases Won by the Builder

1. Case Summary: In two separate instances, the builder successfully defended against complaints regarding the cancellation of allotment and refund requests. In both cases, the respondent (Pratham Infratech) argued that the appellants …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Pratham Infratech Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into their business practices and legal compliance. The cases highlight two recurring themes: unilateral cancellation of allotments and refund disputes, both of which demonstrate a troubling pattern of non-compliance with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA).

The first type of cases involves the builder canceling the allotment of office space without providing any formal notification or reasons for the cancellation. In these instances, the builder would unilaterally refund the amount paid by the complainants, asserting that the cancellations were requested by family members of the complainants. However, the authority found that such actions violated RERA provisions, which likely require proper communication and valid reasons for cancellation.

Common reasons for bringing these cases to court include the arbitrary nature of the cancellations and the lack of transparency in the builder's dealings. …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Pratham Infratech Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information.

The builder has been involved in several disputes primarily revolving around refund claims, delayed possession of properties, and penalties imposed by buyers. The common theme in these cases is the recurring issue of refund requests from respondents who alleged that the builder either delayed possession or wrongfully imposed penalties. This pattern points to heightened tensions in the ongoing relationships between builders and buyers, often leading to legal confrontations.

The reasons why the builder brought these cases to court appear to center around contesting allegations of failure to deliver possession and responding to claims for refunds. In the instances reviewed, the builder argued that the respondents had not substantiated their claims regarding delays or wrongful penalties, thereby asserting their right to uphold the allotments. The disputes often seemed to arise from …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis