PRATHAM PROPERTIES

Introduction

When considering purchasing property, it's crucial to thoroughly research the builders involved. In this blog post, we will delve into Pratham Properties, a builder primarily operating in Gujarat. Understanding their legal history and client interactions can inform potential buyers about what to expect.

Company Overview

Builder Name: Pratham Properties
Number of Complaints: 3
Cases Won: 1
Cases Lost: 2
States with Projects: Gujarat

Legal Case Analysis

To better understand Pratham Properties, we will analyze the legal cases involving them. This not only reveals the challenges the builder has faced but also how they managed client claims.

Cases Lost

• Total: 1 Case Lost
  Details: The lone case lost by Pratham Properties involved a complaint from a buyer who alleged delayed possession and a failure to provide agreed-upon facilities. The builder argued that the delay was due to the buyer's actions, which indicates a common pattern of disputes centered on either …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Pratham Properties that it lost reveals several key points across the complaints raised by the other parties. The disputes can be primarily grouped into two common themes: amenities and facilities disputes, and project compliance and regulatory issues.

The first type of dispute revolves around the promised amenities that buyers expected to receive when purchasing properties developed by Pratham Properties. In one significant case, the complainant alleged that the builder provided defective facilities, including a jacuzzi, landscape garden, gym, cricket pitch, sauna, steam bathroom, auto cut-off fire system, and parking. The builder denied these allegations, claiming that all facilities were provided in working condition. However, the RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority) ruled in favor of the complainant, ordering Pratham Properties to provide a landscape garden and cricket pitch within three months. This highlights a pattern where buyers are not only expecting timely possession of their …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, PRATHAM PROPERTIES, which the builder won, revealed the following insights into common themes and disputes that arise in real estate transactions.

The cases primarily grouped under various themes such as 'Delayed Possession Claims' highlight that buyers often express dissatisfaction regarding the timeliness of possession. However, a closer look reveals that many delays are sometimes attributed to the actions or inaction of these buyers themselves. Similarly, claims around 'Fulfilling Contractual Obligations' often involve arguments about whether facilities promised in the agreement were actually delivered. The builder defended these claims by pointing out that they fulfilled obligations according to the agreements signed.

These disputes often arise from common grievances such as penalties imposed for delays, which can stem from unrealistic expectations on the buyers' part, and differences regarding what constitutes quality construction, pointing to perceived deficiencies. The complaints highlight a potential …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis