No Logo Available

PRAYAGRAJ DEVELOPERS

3.8/5 (3 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Prayagraj Developers is a real estate builder currently active in Gujarat. However, its track record in legal matters raises concerns among potential buyers. This blog post aims to dissect the builder's legal history by examining complaints, court cases, and judgments.

Overview of Legal Complaints

With a total of three complaints filed against Prayagraj Developers, the outcomes reveal a concerning trend. The builder has lost all three cases brought against it, leading to a troubling legal history that prospective clients should consider.

Details of Legal Cases

Cases Lost by Prayagraj Developers

  1. Complaint by an Appellant: The appellant claimed they had adhered to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, arguing that the respondent lacked jurisdiction to impose fines.
    • Respondent's Stance: It was asserted that the builder had not registered the project with the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (GRERA) and failed to display registration details on advertisements.

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Payment Disputes Compensation Claims

Analysis of the cases filed against Prayagraj Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around three common topics: delayed possession claims, payment disputes, and compensation claims.

Many of the complaints made by the purchasers highlight significant delays in the possession of properties. In one case, the complainant detailed how they had made full payment for a flat yet had not received possession or the corresponding sale documents. This points to an troubling trend where buyers are kept waiting indefinitely for their investments, a fundamental breach of contract and trust.

Payment disputes emerge as another critical theme. In the case mentioned, the builder contested the complaint by claiming they had not received any payment, which indicates a significant communication gap or potential negligence in maintaining proper transaction records. This highlights the need for clear payment acknowledgments and transparent accounting practices in …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Non-compliance Penalties for Violations Project Registration Issues

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Prayagraj Developers, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the nature of disputes surrounding the builder's operations. One predominant theme emerging from the cases is 'Regulatory Non-compliance,' which primarily involves the builder's failure to adhere to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. In this particular case, the builder contested a penalty imposed for not registering their project with GRERA and for failing to display the required project registration number in advertisements. Such regulatory oversights can lead to severe repercussions, including hefty fines and reputational damage in the real estate market.

Additionally, the theme of 'Penalties for Violations' encapsulates the broader category of disputes where builders are held accountable for failing to meet regulations. In many cases, builders attempt to argue against imposed penalties, citing lack of jurisdiction from the regulatory authority over them, as seen in this case. However, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review