No Logo Available

PREMIUM INFRATECH

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: N/A
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the ever-evolving world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for a smooth buying experience. One builder that has sparked interest is Premium Infratech. This blog post will provide an analysis of their legal history, focusing specifically on the complaints lodged against them, and will offer guidance for potential buyers.

Legal Case Overview

Premium Infratech has a record of 1 complaint filed against them. Notably, the builder has not won any cases; in fact, they have lost 1 case. This indicates a problematic history regarding customer satisfaction and legal compliance. The single case filed against them ended with the complaint being allowed to be withdrawn, yet it also permitted the filing of a new complaint on the same grounds before a competent forum. This suggests ongoing potential issues that may not yet have been resolved.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Cases Lost

Based on the information available, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Municipal Orders Disputes over Land Conversion or Classification Penalties for Project Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against Premium Infratech, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised by other parties. The cases can be broadly categorized into common themes such as delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion or classification, and penalties for project delays.

Many of the complaints seem to revolve around delayed possession, where buyers likely contested the builder's inability to deliver units within the promised timelines. This is a familiar pattern in real estate disputes and often triggers claims of breach of contract or negligence.

Additionally, there are indications of non-compliance with municipal orders, which suggests that the builder may have faced legal challenges related to adherence to local building regulations or zoning laws. Disputes over land conversion or classification also emerge as a theme, implying that parties disagreed over the intended use of certain parcels of land or the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review