| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the real estate market, trust and reliability are of paramount importance, especially when considering a builder for your dream home. One such builder, Premshree Real Estate Private Limited, has garnered attention in Odisha, but with a mix of successes and setbacks in legal battles. This blog post delves into the builder's legal journey, analyzing patterns in their cases, and providing valuable tips for potential buyers.
Overview of Complaints and Legal Cases
Premshree Real Estate Private Limited has faced a total of four legal complaints, resulting in one case won and three cases lost. Understanding the nature of these disputes is essential to assess the builder's standing.
Cases Lost
- Context: In cases where Premshree Real Estate lost, the outcomes indicate concerns related to agreements and obligations. One notable case involved a claim where the appellants asserted that a receipt signed by the defendant suggested no objection to dropping proceedings …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Premshree Real Estate Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around two main topics: delayed possession claims and compensation disputes.
The first type of case involves claims made by buyers regarding delayed possession of properties they had purchased. In one significant case, a complainant alleged that after paying Rs. 60,00,000 for four flats, the builder failed to deliver possession within the agreed-upon timeframe. This case illustrates a common experience among buyers who entrust builders with substantial financial investments, only to face uncertainty and delays in obtaining their properties.
The second theme centers on compensation disputes, where buyers seek adequate compensation for the distress and financial losses caused by the builder's failure to fulfill contractual obligations. In the case mentioned earlier, the Adjudicating Officer directed the builder to pay a compensation of Rs. 1,00,00,000 to the …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Premshree Real Estate Private Limited, which it lost, reveals several insightful aspects concerning their legal disputes.
Firstly, the cases can generally be grouped under common themes revolving around the execution and interpretation of agreements, particularly Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and signed receipts. One significant type of dispute relates to the execution of MoUs where the builder claimed the other party had no objections to dropping proceedings, highlighting a reliance on formal agreements. Another theme involves disagreements stemming from the interpretation of signed receipts, where the builder contended that consent had been appropriately obtained.
Common reasons for the builder taking legal action include contesting perceived unfair interpretations of MoUs or seeking to enforce terms outlined therein. A notable trigger has been the alleged voluntary agreements that were contested by the other party, indicating a frequent clash related to the authenticity …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Premshree Real Estate Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The data showcases multiple themes in the disputes faced by the builder, primarily revolving around issues related to court orders and their fairness.
One recurring theme is the appeal against ex parte orders, where the builder contested judgments made in their absence and successfully argued for their recall. In one such case, the appellant claimed that an ex parte order passed on October 8, 2021, was unfair. The respondent, in a notable turn of events, consented to this recall, leading the court to set aside the previous order and restore the case for a hearing on its merits.
These cases indicate that the builder often brings matters to court to contest decisions they believe were made unfairly or without proper consideration of the facts. A common pattern emerges where …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!