| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder is paramount for a successful property investment. This post focuses on Presistent Aluminium Private Limited, a builder with operations in Odisha, and examines their legal history, including complaints and cases. By exploring their track record, we aim to provide valuable insights for potential buyers.
Overview of Presistent Aluminium Private Limited
Presistent Aluminium Private Limited has reported only one complaint to date, indicating a relatively low level of customer dissatisfaction compared to many of its counterparts in the industry. However, it is important to note that the builder has been unsuccessful in all legal matters brought against them, having lost one case and not winning any. This highlights a need for cautious consideration by prospective buyers.
Legal Case Details
The sole case against Presistent Aluminium Private Limited provides significant insight into their business practices and response to challenges:
- Type of …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Persistent Aluminium Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, Project Quality Assurance Disputes, and Penalties for Project Delays.
The first theme, Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, encompasses cases where the builder failed to adhere to the regulatory requirements imposed by local authorities. This often involved delays in submitting mandatory project quality reports (QPRs) or other essential documentation, which led to legal consequences.
Project Quality Assurance Disputes constitute another significant theme. In these cases, the builder's commitment to rectifying defects and ensuring project quality came under scrutiny. Although the builder claimed to be proactive in addressing these issues, the legal outcomes suggest that their actions may not have met the expected standards or were not adequately documented.
Lastly, the theme of Penalties for Project …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!