| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding Prime Developers: A Review of Their Legal Track Record
Overview of Prime Developers
Prime Developers operates primarily in the states of Chhattisgarh and Gujarat, positioning itself as a key player in the real estate market. However, with a total of 11 complaints registered against them and a mixed record in legal cases, it's essential to closely examine their operations and customer engagements.
Legal Case Analysis
In the realm of legal disputes, Prime Developers has experienced both victories and setbacks. The specifics are compelling for potential buyers.
Cases Won by Prime Developers
- Overall Winning Cases: Out of 11 complaints, Prime Developers has managed to win only 4 cases. Interestingly, examining these victories reveals some underlying patterns:
- Prime Developers often managed to assert compliance with authority orders, as seen in cases where they successfully defended claims related to regulatory compliance and timely updates.
- Their legal defenses were often based on …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Prime Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes faced by the builder. The cases can be broadly categorized into four topics: Delayed Possession Claims, Non-compliance with Municipal Orders, Failure to Refund, and Penalties for Project Delays.
The Delayed Possession Claims primarily revolved around the builder's inability to hand over possession of flats on time, which led to dissatisfaction among buyers. For instance, there were claims stating that the builder delayed the execution of registry deeds, which is critical in finalizing property transactions. The reasons provided for these delays often revolved around the builders' claims of delayed payment from buyers, highlighting a pattern where the builder attributed delays to the other party's inability to fulfill their obligations.
Non-compliance with Municipal Orders was another recurring theme. In several cases, the builder was accused of failing …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Prime Developers, which it won, revealed the following key insights into its legal disputes and overall reputation in the market.
Regulatory Compliance Issues
One recurring theme in the cases involved disputes with the Chhattisgarh Real Estate Regulatory Authority regarding actions taken against the builder for the 'Samriddhi Commercial Center' project. The builder contested these actions, indicating that issues were not grounded in legitimate regulatory concerns but may have stemmed from misunderstandings or misinterpretations.
Project Management Disputes
Cases such as those concerning project management often revolved around allegations of delays and performance issues. In this case, the builder sought to defend its operations and project timelines, attributing any delays not to negligence on its part but potentially to external factors outside its control.
Penalties and Claims for Delays
The builder sought to contest penalties imposed due …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases can be broadly categorized into three recurring themes:
- Refund Claims and Deposit Disputes: Several cases centered on buyers claiming refunds for deposits made towards properties like 'Lotus Tower'. For instance, one applicant asserted that she had made substantial payments but sought a refund after canceling her booking.
- Inadequate Evidence in Claims: The builder was able to challenge claims effectively, particularly when opposing parties struggled to present sufficient evidence regarding the status of payments and refund requests. In one notable case, the court found that the applicant had not requested a refund until after a significant delay.
- Non-compliance with Legal Requirements: Many cases were dismissed due to procedural grounds or the authority deeming applications not maintainable under the legal frameworks, like the Real Estate (Regulation …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from PRIME DEVELOPERS?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.