| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder can significantly impact your investment and homeownership experience. Today, we delve into Prime Infrastructure & Developers, a builder operating primarily in Madhya Pradesh, examining their track record in legal disputes, project execution, and customer satisfaction.
Legal Case Overview
Prime Infrastructure & Developers has faced considerable legal challenges, with a total of 4 complaints lodged against them. Disturbingly, they have lost all 4 of these cases, raising questions about their reliability and service delivery. By analyzing the cases, we can extract key insights into their operations and the common issues faced by their clients.
Analysis of Lost Cases
The cases lost by Prime Infrastructure & Developers reveal a consistent pattern of failure to provide timely possession of properties and issues surrounding financial settlements with customers:
- Lack of Possession: In each case, the appellant has claimed that despite full payment, …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Prime Infrastructure & Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes faced by the builder. The cases primarily revolved around two key issues: delayed possession claims and disputes over payment and refunds.
The delayed possession claims encompassed scenarios where the builder failed to complete construction work on flats within the stipulated time or did not provide possession to buyers despite receiving full payment. This theme was consistently observed across multiple cases, indicating a systemic issue within the builder's operational capabilities, particularly concerning project management and adherence to timelines.
The disputes over payment and refunds primarily involved claims from buyers who had paid excess amounts for their flats and were not provided with refunds or compensations after the stipulated possession dates had passed. The builder's defense often revolved around claims of complete payment receipt and the non-refundable nature of …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!